Novatian, On the Trinity 22
But why, even though we seem to be rushing on to another part of the discussion, do we skip over that passage in the apostle? He writes of the one who, existing in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as something to be seized; but he emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in human likeness, and, found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross (Philippians 2:5-8). Therefore God also highly exalted him and gave him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Philippians 2:9-11).
The text says, ‘Who, when he was in the form of God.’ If Christ were only a man, he would be in the image of God, not in the form—for we know that man was made according to the image, not according to the form, nor do angels possess the form of God. Who, then, is this one who was found in the form of God, as we have said and as we read? It can only be the preeminent and noble Son of God, the Word of God, the imitator of all the Father’s works, who himself works just as his Father does, and is therefore in the form (as we have expressed it) of God the Father. And rightly was he declared to be in the form of God, since he himself is above all things and holds the divine power over all creation, and is God, an example of the Father. Yet this very status he received from his own Father, that he might be both God and Lord of all, and God in the form of God the Father, begotten and brought forth from him.
Therefore, although he existed in the form of God, he did not regard equality with God as a thing to be grasped. For even though he knew himself to be God from God the Father, he never compared or equated himself with God the Father, mindful that he is from his Father and that he possesses his very being because the Father gave it to him. Consequently, both before the assumption of flesh and after the assumption of the body, and after the resurrection itself, he rendered obedience to the Father in all things, and continues to render it. This proves that he never considered it a seizure to claim a certain divinity in order to make himself equal to God the Father. On the contrary, being obedient and subject to every command and will of the Father, he was content even to take the form of a servant—that is, to become a man—and to assume the substance of flesh and body, which, by being born, he took on from the bondage of the Father’s sins according to man. At that time he also emptied himself, by not refusing to take on the frailty of the human condition.
For if he had been born only as a man, he would not have been emptied; a man, when born, grows, he is not emptied. For while he begins to be what he was not, he cannot possess what he did not have; as we have said, he is not emptied but rather grows and is enriched. But if Christ is emptied in his birth by taking the form of a servant, how can he be only a man? Of such a one it would have been more truly said that he was enriched, not emptied, when he was born—unless it is because the authority of the divine Word, resting for a time in order to assume humanity and not exercising his own powers, lowered himself for a time and laid them aside, while bearing the man he had assumed. He empties himself as he descends to injuries and insults, as he hears blasphemies and endures indignities. Yet the fruit of that humility appears at once. For he received the name that is above every name, which we understand to be none other than the name of God. Since it belongs to God alone to be above all things, it follows that the name which is above every name belongs to him who is above all things. That name, therefore, is God’s; and it belongs, consequently, to him who, existing in the form of God, did not regard equality with God as a thing to be grasped.
For if Christ were not God, every knee would not bow to him—in heaven and on earth and under the earth—nor would all creation, visible and invisible, every creature, be subjected or made subject to a mere man who remembered that he existed before man. From the fact that Christ is said to be in the form of God, and that he is shown to have emptied himself in his birth according to the flesh, and that it is declared he received from the Father the name that is above every name, and that every knee of heavenly, earthly, and infernal beings is shown to bow and bend at that name, and that this very thing is asserted to happen to the glory of God the Father—it follows, consequently, that he is not a man only because he became obedient to the Father unto death, even death on a cross. From these preceding realities, which proclaim the divinity of Christ, the Lord Christ Jesus is shown to be God, which the heretics refuse to accept.
Latin
Cur autem, licet ad aliam partem disputandi festinare uideamur, illum praetereamus apud apostolum locum? gui cum in forma dei esset, non rapinam arbitratus est aequalem se deo esse; sed semetipsum exinaniuit, formam serui accipiens, in similitudine hominum factus, et habitu tnwentus ut homo: humiliauit se, oboediens factus usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis: propterea et deus illum superexaltauit, et dedit illi nomen quod est super omne nomen; ut in nomine Iesu omne genu flectatur caelestium terrestrium et infernorum, et omnis lingua confiteatur, quoniam dominus Iesus in gloria est dei patris. qui cum in forma dei esset, inquit. si homo tantummodo Christus, in imagine dei, non forma det rehominem enim scimus ad imaginem, non ad sed nec in angelis formam dei Quis ergo est iste, qui in forma dei, ut diximus, factus est legimus; nisi quoniam hic praecipuus atque generosus prae omnibus dei filius, uerbum dei, imitator omnium paternorum operum, dum et ipse operatur sicut et pater eius, in forma (ut expressimus) est dei patris. et merito in forma pronuntiatus est dei, dum et ipse super omnia, et omnis creaturae diuinam obtinens potestatem, et deus est exemplo patris; hoc ipsum tamen a patre proprio consecutus, ut omnium et deus esset, et dominus esset, et deus ad formam dei patris ex ipso genitus atque prolatus. hic ergo quamuis esset in forma dei, non est rapinam arbitratus aequalem se deo esse. qQuamuis enim se ex deo patre deum esse meminisset, numquam se deo patri aut comparauit aut contulit, memor se esse ex suo patre, et hoc ipsum, quod est, habere se, quia pater dedisset. inde denique et ante carnis assumptionem, sed et post assumptionem corporis, post ipsam praeterea resurrectionem, omnem patri in omnibus rebus oboedientiam praestitit pariter ac praestat. quo probatur numquam arbitratum illum esse rapinam quandam diuinitatem, ut aequaret se patri deo: quin immo contra, omni ipsius imperio et uoluntati oboediens atque subiectus, etiam ut formam serui susciperet contentus fuit—hoc est, hominem illum fieri—et substantiam carnis et corporis, quam ex paternorum secundum hominem delictorum seruitute uenientem nascendo suscepit. quo tempore se etiam exinaniuit, dum humanam condicionis fragilitatem suscipere non recusauit. quoniam si homo tantummodo natus fuisset, per hoc exinanitus non esset. homo enim nascens augetur, non exinanitur: nam dum incipit esse quod cum non esset habere non potuit, ut diximus, non exinanitur, sed potius augetur atque ditatur. at si Christus exinanitur in eo quod nascitur, formam serui accipiendo, quomodo homo tantummodo est? de quo uerius dictum fuisset, locupletatum illum esse tunc cum nasceretur, non exinanitum: nisi quoniam auctoritas diuini uerbi, ad suscipiendum hominem interim conquiescens, nec se suis uiribus exercens, deicit se ad tempus atque deponit, dum hominem fert quem suscepit. exinanit se, dum ad iniurias contumeliasque descendit, dum audit infanda, experitur indigna. cuius tamen humilitatis adest statim egregius fructus. accepit enim omen, quod est super omne nomen, quod utique non aliud intellegimus esse quam nomen dei. nam cum dei sit solius esse super omnia, consequens est, ut nomen illud quod est super omne nomen sit eius, qui super omnia est. dei est ergo nomen illud quod super,omne nomen est: quod nomen est eius utique consequenter, qui, cum in forma dei fuisset, non rapinam arbitratus est aequalem se deo esse. neque enim si non deus esset Christus, omne se in nomine eius genu flecteret, caelestium et terrestrium et infernorum: nec uisibilia aut inuisibilia, aut rerum omnium omnis creatura homini esset subiecta siue substrata, quae se ante hominem esse meminisset. ex quo dum iz forma dei esse Christus dicitur, et dum in natiuitatem secundum carnem se exinanisse monstratur, et dum id accepisse nomen a patre quod sit super omne nomen exprimitur, et dum in nomine eius omne genu caelestium, terrenorum et infernorum se flectere et curuare monstratur, et hoc ipsum in gloriam dei patris succurrere asseritur; consequenter non ex illo tantum homo est, quia oboediens patri factus est usque ad mortem, mortem autem crucis; sed ex his etiam rebus superioribus diuinitatem Christi sonantibus, dominus Christus Iesus et deus, quod haeretici nolunt, esse monstratur.