Wealth and Alms

Lactantius, Divine Institutes 6.6

Lactantius · c. 250–c. 325 AD

First I argued that knowing what is good is not the same as virtue; then I defined virtue and showed where it resides. It follows that I must now briefly demonstrate that the philosophers were ignorant of what good and evil truly are, since this was nearly proven in the third book when I discussed the highest good. Those who did not know the highest good necessarily erred concerning all other goods and evils, which are not the highest; no one can rightly judge these things who does not grasp the very source from which they flow. The source of all good is God; the source of evil is the one who is the constant enemy of the divine name, whom I have often mentioned. From these two principles all good and evil originate. Whatever comes from God has this purpose: it brings immortality, which is the highest good. Whatever comes from that other source has this function: it kills and destroys those who have been drawn away from heavenly things and plunged into earthly things, consigning them to eternal punishment, which is the highest evil. Is it doubtful, then, that all those philosophers were ignorant of good and evil, since they knew neither God nor God's adversary? Consequently they limited the end of all goods to the body and to this brief life, which must inevitably dissolve and die; they advanced no further. All their precepts and all the goods they propose cling to the earth and lie in the dust, because they perish together with the body, which is earth. These things do not pertain to the true life of man, but to the pursuit or increase of wealth, honors, glory, and power — all of which are mortal, just like the person who toiled to obtain them. Hence the saying: virtue consists in knowing the end and measure of a thing. For they teach the means and arts by which family wealth is to be sought, because they see it is usually sought badly. But such virtue is not set before the wise; virtue is not the quest for wealth, whose discovery and possession are not in our power. Thus both the seeking and the obtaining of wealth are easier for the wicked than for the good. Therefore virtue cannot reside in those things which are sought, since it is in despising them that virtue's power and reason appear; nor will virtue turn to those very things which a great and lofty soul strives to trample and spurn. Nor is it right that a soul intent on heavenly goods should be diverted from its immortal possessions to acquire these fragile things. Rather, the reason of virtue consists in securing those goods which neither any human being nor death itself can take from us.

Latin

Dixi, quod erat primum, scientiam boni non esse uirtutem, deinde, quid sit uirtus et in quo sit: sequitur ut id quoque ipsum, quid sit bonum et malum, nescisse philosophos breuiter ostendam, quia paene declaratum est in libro tertio, cum de summo bono disputarem. qui autem quid esset summum nescierunt, et in ceteris bonis malisue, quae summa non sunt, errauerint necesse est: quae non potest uero iudicio examinare qui fontem ipsum non tenet unde illa descendunt. fons autem bonorum deus est, malorum uero ille scilicet diuini nominis semper inimicus, de quo saepe diximus: ab his duobus principiis bona malaque oriuntur. quae ueniunt a deo, hanc habent rationem, ut inmortalitatem parent, quod est summum bonum: quae autem ab illo altero, id habent officium, ut a caelestibus auocatum terrenisque demersum ad poenam interficiant sempiternam, quod est summum malum. num igitur dubium est quin illi omnes quid esset bonum et malum ignoraueriut, qui nec deum nec aduersarium dei scierunt? itaque finem bonorum ad corpus et ad hanc uitam breuem retulerunt, quam scilicet solui et occidere necesse est, non sunt progressi ulterius, sed omnia eorum praecepta et omnia quae inducunt bona, terrae inhaerent et humi iacent, quoniam simul cum corpore, quod est terra, moriuntur. pertinent enim non ad uitam homini conparandam, sed ad quaerendas uel augendas opes honores gloriam potentiam: quae sunt uniuersa mortalia, tam scilicet quam ille qui ut ea sibi contingerent laborauit. hinc est illud: uirtus, quaerendae finem rei scire modumque. praecipiunt enim quibus modis et quibus artibus res familiaris quaerenda sit, quia uident male quaeri solere. sed huiusmodi uirtus non est proposita sapienti: nec enim uirtus est opes quaerere, quarum neque inuentio neque possessio in nostra potestate est. itaque et quaesitu et obtentu faciliores sunt malis quam bonis. non potest ergo uirtus esse in iis rebus quaerendis in quarum contemptu uis ac ratio uirtutis apparet, nec ad ea ipsa transfugiet quae magno et excelso animo calcare ac proterere gestit, neque fas est animam caelestibus intentam bonis, ut haec fragilia sibi conparet, ab inmortalibus suis opibus auocari, sed potissimum in iis rebus conparandis uirtutis ratio consistit quas nobis nec homo ullus nec mors ipsa possit auferre.

Report a mistake in this passage