Attributes and Providence

Novatian, On the Trinity 4

Novatian · fl. c. 250 AD

The Lord declares Him good, and rightly so; the whole world bears witness to His goodness, for He would not have established it if He were not good. Since all things are very good, it follows necessarily that the things He established are also good, and they prove their Establisher to be good; moreover, nothing that comes from a good Establisher can be anything but good. From this truth all evil is excluded. He cannot be the author or craftsman of any evil work, He who claims the name of the Perfect One, the Father, and the Judge, especially because He is the avenger and judge of every evil deed. Evil comes to humanity from no other source than withdrawal from the good God. This withdrawal is evident in humanity, not because it was necessary, but because man himself so willed it. God appeared, and, lest envy be seen in the God from whom evil originated, He shone forth. Therefore He is always like Himself; He never changes or transforms into any form, lest through change He appear mortal. Change is a portion of conversion, and conversion implies a kind of death. Consequently, no addition of any part or honor ever accrues to Him, lest something seem ever to have been lacking to the Perfect One; nor does any loss occur in Him, lest He seem to have accepted the condition of mortality. Rather, what He is, He always is; who He is, He always is; what kind He is, He always is. Increments reveal an origin, and losses prove death and destruction; therefore He says, 'I am God, and I have not changed' (Exodus 3:14-15), holding His state forever, since what is not born cannot be converted. It is necessary that whatever God is, He always be God, preserving Himself by His own virtues. And therefore He says: 'I AM WHO I AM.' A thing has this name because it always retains the same quality. Change removes the name 'He Who Is,' for whatever undergoes change is shown to be mortal by that very fact: it ceases to be what it was and begins to be what it was not. Rightly, then, God's state remains forever, since without loss through change He is always the same and equal to Himself. What is not born cannot change; only things that are made or generated enter conversion, because what once did not exist learns to exist by being born, and so is changed by being born. But those things that have neither birth nor maker have excluded change from themselves, since they lack the origin in which the cause of conversion lies. Therefore He is also declared to be One, because He has no equal; for God, whatever can be God, must be the Highest. And the Highest must be such that it is the Highest, since it is beyond compare. Therefore He must be alone and One, to whom nothing can be compared, because He has no equal. Two infinites cannot exist, as the nature of reality itself dictates. The infinite is that which has neither origin nor end; whatever occupies the whole excludes the beginning of another. If God did not contain all that exists, He would be found within what contains Him, and the container would be found to be less; thus God would cease to be, reduced to the power of another by whose lesser magnitude He would be enclosed, and the container would rather have begun to be God. It follows that even the proper name of God cannot be spoken, because it cannot be conceived. A name contains whatever is comprehended by the condition of its nature; a name is the signification of a thing that can be grasped by that name. But when the subject is such that it cannot even be grasped by our intellects, how can it be pronounced with a worthy title, since it is beyond intellect and therefore beyond the signification of any title? When God adds and prefers His name for certain reasons and occasions, we must understand that He is not so much revealing a legitimate property of the name as establishing a certain signification, to which men run so that they may seem to obtain God's mercy through it. He is therefore immortal and incorruptible, feeling no loss whatsoever and having no end. Because He is incorruptible, He is also immortal; and because He is immortal, He is certainly incorruptible; each quality is intertwined with the other in a mutual, reciprocal bond, and connected to the state of eternity by a vicarious concatenation, with immortality proceeding from incorruption and incorruption coming from immortality.

Latin

Quem solum merito bonum pronuntiat dominus: cuius bonitatis totus testis est mundus, quem non instituisset, nisi bonus fuisset. nam si omnia bona ualde, consequenter ac merito et quae instituta sunt bona bonum institutorem probauerunt, et quae a bono institutore sunt, aliud quam bona esse non possunt. ex quo omne malum facessit adeo. nec enim potest fieri ut sit initiator aut artifex ullius mali operis, qui nomen sibi perfecti uindicat et parentis et iudicis, maxime cum omnis mali operis uindex sit et iudex; quoniam et non aliunde occurrit homini malum, nisi a bono deo recessisset. hoc autem ipsum in homine denotatur: non quia necesse fuit, sed quia ipse sic uoluit. apparuit, et, ne inuidia in deo esse uideretur, a quo malum ortum esset, eluxit. Hic ergo semper sui est similis, nec se umquam in aliquas formas uertit aut mutat, ne per immutationem etiam mortalis esse uideatur. immutatio enim conuersionis portio cuiusdam comprehenditur mortis. ideo nec adiectio in illo umquam ullius aut partis aut honoris accedit, ne quid umquam perfecto defuisse uideatur; nec detrimentum in eo aliquod agitur, ne gradus mortalitatis receptus esse uideatur: sed quod est, id semper est, et qui est, semper ipse est, et qualis est, semper talis est. nam et incrementa originem monstrant, et detrimenta mortem atque interitum probant, et ideo: ego, ait, sum deus, et non sum mutatus, statum suum tenens semper, dum id quod natum non est, conuerti non potest. hoc enim in ipso, quicquid illud potest quod est deus, semper sit necesse est, ut semper sit deus, seruans sese uirtutibus suis. et ideo dicit: ego sum qui sum. quod enim est, ideo hoc habet nomen, quoniam eandem semper sui obtinet qualitatem. immutatio enim tollit illud nomen ‘quod est’: quicquid enim aliquando uertitur, mortale ostenditur hoc ipso quod conuertitur: desinit enim esse quod fuerat, et incipit consequenter esse quod non erat. idcirco et merito in deo manet semper status suus, dum sine detrimento commutationis semper sui et similis et aequalis est. quod enim natum non est, nec mutari potest: ea enim sola in conuersionem ueniunt, quaecumque fiunt uel quaecumque gignuntur; dum quae aliquando non fuerant, discunt esse nascendo, atque ideo nascendo conuerti. at enim illa quae nec natiuitatem habent nec artificem, excluserunt a se demutationem, dum in qua conuersionis causa est, non habent originem. Ideo et unus pronuntiatus est, dum parem non habet: deus enim, quicquid esse potest quod deus est, summum sit necesse est. summum autem quicquid est, ita demum summum esse oportet, dum extra comparem est. et ideo solum et unum sit necesse est, cui conferri nihil potest, dum parem non habet. quoniam nec duo infinita esse possunt, ut rerum dictat ipsa natura. infinitum est autem, quicquid nec originem habet omnino, nec finem. excludit enim alterius initium, quicquid occupauerit totum. quoniam si non omne id quod est, quicquid est, continet, dum intra id inuenitur quo continetur, minus inuentum quo continetur, deus esse desierit, in alterius potestatem redactus, cuius magnitudine, qua minor, fuerit inclusus: et ideo quod continuit, deus potius esse iam coeperit. Ex quo effectum est ut nec nomen dei proprium possit edici, quoniam non possit nec concipi. id enim nomine continetur, quicquid etiam ex naturae suae condicione comprehenditur. nomen enim significantia est eius rei, quae comprehendi potuit ex nomine. at quando id de quo agitur tale est, ut condigne nec ipsis intellectibus colligatur, quomodo appellationis digne uocabulo pronuntiabitur, quod, dum extra intellectum est, etiam supra appellationis significantiam sit necesse est? ut merito quando nomen suum deus ex quibusdam rationibus et occasionibus adicit et praefert, non tam legitimam proprietatem appellationis sciamus esse depromptam, quam significantiam quandam constitutam; ad quam dum homines decurrunt, dei misericordiam per ipsam impetrare posse uideantur. Est ergo et immortalis et incorruptibilis, nec detrimenta sentiens omnino, nec finem. nam et quia incorruptibilis, ideo et immortalis; et quia immortalis, utique et incorruptibilis; utroque inuicem sibi et in se conexione mutua perplexo, et ad statum aeternitatis uicaria concatenatione producto, et immortalitate de incorruptione descendente, et incorruptione de immortalitate ueniente.

Report a mistake in this passage