Tertullian, Against Marcion 17
By the Church's own testimony, this letter was sent to the Ephesians, not the Laodiceans; yet Marcion sometimes tries to rewrite the title as if he were a meticulous investigator in this matter. But the title is of no consequence, because the apostle wrote to everyone even while addressing a specific group, certainly preaching the God who is revealed in Christ—to whom belong the very things that are preached. So to whom will it belong, according to the good purpose he set forth in the mystery of his will, in the administration of the fullness of times—to use a phrase that echoes the Greek sense of *anakephalaiōsasthai*, that is, to sum up all things in Christ, to bring them back to their starting point or recount them from the beginning—both things in heaven and things on earth (Ephesians), if not to the one to whom all things belong from the beginning, and even the beginning itself, from which come the times and the administration of the fullness of times, on account of which all things are recounted in Christ? What beginning—that is, what source—does another god's work have? What times without a beginning? What fulfillment without times? What administration without fulfillment? Finally, what did he do on earth long ago, so that some long administration of fulfilling times could be credited with summing up all things in Christ, even those in heaven? Nor will we regard things done in heaven, whatever they are, as the work of another rather than the one from whom it is agreed all things on earth proceed. But if these things cannot be attributed from the beginning to anyone but the Creator, who will believe they are summed up in another's Christ, and not by their own Author and in his own Christ? If they are the Creator's, they must necessarily differ from those of a different god; if they differ, they are certainly contrary. How then can contrary things be summed up in him by whom they are finally destroyed? The following words also declare Christ, when he says: so that we might be to the praise of his glory, we who hoped beforehand in Christ. For who could have hoped beforehand—that is, hoped in God before he came—except the Jews, to whom Christ was announced from the beginning? Therefore the one who was announced was also the one hoped for beforehand. And so this refers to them, that is, the Jews, so that he draws a distinction, turning to the nations: in whom you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel, in which you believed and were sealed with the Holy Spirit of his promise (Ephesians). Whose promise? The one made through Joel: 'In the last days I will pour out my Spirit on all flesh' (Joel 2:28)—that is, also on the nations. Thus both the Spirit and the gospel will be in Christ, who was hoped for beforehand while he was being preached. But 'the Father of glory' is also he whose Christ, the King of glory, is sung in the psalm ascending: 'Who is this King of glory? The Lord of hosts, he is the King of glory' (Psalm 24:10); from him the 'Spirit of wisdom' is sought, with whom these kinds of spiritual gifts are also enumerated among the seven spirits through Isaiah; he will give 'enlightened eyes of the heart,' who also enriched the outer eyes with light, to whom the blindness of the people is displeasing—and who is blind, if not my children?
Latin
Ecclesiae quidem ueritate epistolam istam ad Ephesios habemus emissam, non ad Laodicenos; sed Marcion et titulum aliquando interpolare gestit, quasi et in isto diligentissimus explorator. nihil autem de titulis interest, cum ad omnes apostolus scripserit dum ad quosdam, certe tamen eum deum praedicans in Christo, cui competunt quae praedicantur. cui ergo competet secundum boni existimationem, quam proposuerit in sacramento uoluntatis suae, in dispensationem adimpletionis temporum — ut ita dixerim, sicut uerbum illud in Graeco sonat — recapitulare — id est ad initium redigere uel ab initio recensere — omnia in Christum, quae in caelis et quae in terrisnisi cuius erunt omnia ab initio, etiam ipsum initium, a quo et tempora et temporum adimple(tio et adimple)tionis dispensatio, ob quam omnia ad initium recensentur in Christo? alterius autem dei quod initium, id est unde, cuius opus nullum? quae tempora sine initio? quae adimpletio sine temporibus? quae dispensatio sine adimpletione? denique quid in terris egit iam olim, ut longa aliqua temporum adimplendorum dispensatio reputetur ad recensenda omnia in Christo, etiam quae in caelis? nec in caelis autem res ab altero actas existimabimus, quaecumque sunt, quam ab eo, a quo et in terris actas omnibus constat. quodsi non capit alterius <omnia) ista deputari ab initio quam creatoris, quis credet ab alio ea recenseri in Christum alium, et non a suo auctore et in suum Christum? si creatoris sunt, diuersa sint necesse est a diuerso deo; si diuersa, utique contraria. quomodo ergo contraria recenseantur in eum, a quo denique destruuntur? nam et sequentia quem renuntiant Christum, cum dicit: ut simus in laudem gloriae (eius) nos, qui praesperauimus in Christum? qui enim praesperasse potuerunt, id est ante sperasse in deum quam uenisset, nisi Iudaei, quibus Christus praenuntiabatur ab initio? qui ergo praenuntiabatur, ille et praesperabatur. atque adeo hoc ad se, id est ad Iudaeos, refert, ut distinctionem faciat conuersus ad nationes: in quo et uos, cum audissetis sermonem ueritatis, euangelium, in quo credidistis et signati estis spiritu promissionis eius sancto. cuius promissionis? factae per Iohelem: in nouissimis diebus effundam de meo spiritu in omnem carnem, id est et in nationes. ita (et) spiritus et euangelium in eo erit Christo, qui praesperabatur, dum praedicabatur. Sed et 'pater gloriae' ille est, cuius Christus rex gloriae canitur in psalmo ascendens: quis est iste rex gloriae? dominus uirtutum ipse est rex gloriae; ab illo 'spiritus sapientiae' optatur, apud quem haec quoque spiritalium species enumeratur inter septem spiritus per Esaiam; ille dabit (inluminatos cordis oculos', qui etiam exteriores oculos luce ditauit, cui displicet caecitas populi: et quis caecus nisi pueri mei?