Martyrdom as Witness

Tertullian, On the Crown 10

Tertullian · c. 155–c. 220 AD

You argue that the ornaments of secular gods turn up even in God's house, so that the crown on the head must be defended as common property. By that logic, you yourself have already ruled that anything not found in God's things has no place in the communion of use. What could be more unworthy of God than what counts as worthy of an idol? And what suits an idol better than what suits the dead? The dead, after all, are crowned the same way: they instantly become idols by their dress and the cult of their consecration, which is a second idolatry for us (Psalm 115:4-8). So the senseless will use that thing exactly as the senseless would, and as if they wanted to abuse it, if they weren't senseless. There is no difference between use and abuse when the truth of use ceases, because the very capacity to perceive has ceased; how can anyone abuse what they lack the faculty to use? For us, however, abuse is not permitted, since the apostle teaches that it is easier not to use a thing at all — unless it is that those who feel nothing do not abuse (1 Corinthians 10:19-21). But the whole thing is void; it is a dead work so far as idols go, yet positively alive with demons, to whom superstition belongs. David says the idols of the nations are silver and gold: they have eyes but do not see, noses but do not smell, hands but do not touch. Through such things one 'enjoys flowers.' If the makers of idols will become like that, those who use anything according to the ornament of idols already are like that. All things are pure to the pure, and all things impure to the impure; but nothing is more impure than idols. Pure substances, as God's things, are common to use by their very nature; what differs is the administration of that use. I myself sacrifice a chicken for my own dinner, no less than Socrates did for Asclepius; if a place smells bad, I burn Arabian incense; but not with the same rite, dress, or equipment used at idols. If the mere word 'idol-offering' pollutes the thing, as the apostle teaches — 'If anyone says, "This is idol food," do not eat it' — how much more when you have gone through the dress, rite, and equipment of idol-offerings? Thus the crown itself becomes idol food. With that rite, dress, and equipment it is sacrificed to the idol by its authors, whose use is especially proper to it, so that it cannot be admitted into communion because it is not found in God's things. Therefore the apostle cries: 'Flee from idolatry' — entirely and completely. Recognize the forest, and how many hidden thorns lie in it. Nothing is to be given to an idol, so nothing is to be taken from an idol. If reclining in an idol's temple is alien to faith, what is it to be seen in an idol's dress? What communion has Christ with Belial? That is why we must flee. A long divorce from idolatry is commanded; we must not approach it closely in anything. Even the earthly dragon sucks the spirit of people from afar. John goes deeper: 'Little children, keep yourselves from idols' — not merely from idolatry as if from an office, but from the very image of them. For it is unworthy that the image of the living God should become the image of an idol and of the dead (1 John 5:21). We have claimed the property of this dress for idols both from its origin and from its superstitious use; and also because, while it is not referred to in God's things, it is more and more assigned as the image of those in whose antiquities, solemnities, and offices it is found. Even their doors, victims, altars, ministers, and priests are crowned. You have the crowns of all the priestly colleges under Claudius. But we have also woven in the distinction between rational and irrational, which meets those who defend communion in all things on the strength of certain examples. It remains, then, to examine the coronation causes themselves, so that while we show they are foreign — indeed contrary to discipline — we may prove that none of them is backed by reason enough to defend such dress and its use for communion, even though some people throw examples at us.

Latin

Ita cum idcirco proponis deorum saecularium ornamenta etiam apud Deum deprehendi, ut inter haec coronam quoque capitis communi usui vindices; ipse tibi jam praescribis non habendum in communionem usus, quod non inveniatur in Dei rebus. Quid enim tam indignum Deo, quam quod dignum idolo? quid autem tam dignum idolo, quam quod et mortuo? Nam et mortuorum est ita coronari: quoniam et ipsi idola statim fiunt et habitu et cultu consecrationis, quae apud nos secunda idololatria est. Igitur qui sensu careant, illorum erit perinde uti ea re cujus careant sensu, atque si abuti ea vellent, si sensu non carerent. Nulla vero distantia est abutendi, cum veritas cessat utendi, cessante natura sentiendi; qua vult quis abutatur, cum non habeat qua utatur? Nobis autem abuti apud apostolum non licet, facilius non uti docentem, nisi quod nec abutuntur qui nihil sentiunt. Sed vacat totum, et est ipsum quoque opus mortuum, quantum in idolis; vivum plane quantum in daemoniis, ad quae pertinet superstitio. Idola nationum, inquit David, argentum et aurum: oculos habent, nec vident, nares, nec odorantur, manus, nec contrectant. Per haec enim floribus frui est. Quod si tales edicit futuros qui idola fabricantur, tales jam sunt qui secundum idolorum ornatum quid utuntur. Omnia munda mundis, ita et immunda omnia immundis: nihil autem immundius idolis. Caeterum substantiae mundae, ut Dei res, et hac sua conditione communes usui: sed ipsius usus administratio interest. Nam et ego mihi gallinaceum macto, non minus quam Aesculapio Socrates: et si me odor alicujus loci offenderit, Arabiae aliquid incendo; sed non eodem ritu, nec eodem habitu, nec eodem apparatu, quo agitur apud idola. Si enim verbo nudo conditio polluitur, ut apostolus docet: Si quis autem dixerit: Hoc idolothytum est, ne contigeris; multo magis cum saltitaveris habitu, et ritu et apparatu idolothytorum, contaminatur. Ita et corona idolothytum efficitur. Hoc enim ritu, et habitu, et apparatu idolo immolatur auctoribus suis: quorum eo vel maxime proprius est usus, ne in communionem possit admitti, quod in Dei rebus non invenitur. Propterea apostolus inclamat: Fugite idololatriam; omnem utique et totam. Recognita silvam, et quantae latitant spinae. Nihil dandum idolo, sic nec sumendum ab idolo. Si in idolio recumbere alienum est a fide, quid in idoli habitu videri? quae communio Christo et Beliae? et ideo fugite. Longum enim divortium mandat ab idololatria; in nullo proxime agendum. Draco etiam terrenus de longinquo homines spiritu absorbet. Altius Joannes: Filioli, inquit, custodite vos ab idolis; non jam ab idololatria quasi ab officio, sed ab ipsa effigie eorum. Indignum enim ut imago Dei vivi, imago idoli et mortui fias. Usque adhuc proprietatem istius habitus et ex originis censu, et ex superstitionis usu idolis vindicamus, ex eo praeterea quod, dum in rebus Dei non refertur, magis magisque imago illorum deputatur, in quorum et antiquitatibus, et solemnitatibus, et officiis convenitur. Ipsae denique fores, et ipsae hostiae et arae, ipsi ministri et sacerdotes eorum coronantur. Habes omnium collegiorum sacerdotalium coronas apud Claudium. Sed et illam interstruximus distinctionem differentiae rationalium et irrationalium, eis occurrentem qui communionem in omnibus de quorumdam exemplorum occasione defendunt. Ad hanc itaque partem caussas jam ipsas coronarias inspici superest, ut dum ostendimus extraneas, imo et contrarias disciplinae, nullam earum rationis patrocinio fultam probemus, quo possit habitus hujusmodi, usus quoque communioni vindicari: etsi sunt quidam quorum exempla nobis objectantur.

Report a mistake in this passage