← All questions

Question 87 · How Christians lived

Marriage, divorce and remarriage: what was allowed?

What the sources show

Shepherd of Hermas c. 140 · Justin Martyr c. 155 · Athenagoras c. 177No remarriage

The earliest writers allow separation for adultery but not remarriage: Hermas says the husband must stay single so his wife can return if she repents. Justin and Athenagoras count remarriage after divorce as adultery. 123

Augustine of Hippo c. 420 · Council of Trent 1563No remarriage

Augustine held the bond lasts until death, and the Latin West made this law (Trent, 1563), while carefully not condemning the Greek practice. 67

Westminster Assembly 1646 · Origen of Alexandria c. 246 · Basil of Caesarea c. 374

The Orthodox allow a second marriage in some cases as a concession, and the Reformed allow the innocent party to remarry after adultery or desertion. 458

The answers given:
ApostolicBefore NicaeaNicaea and afterMiddle AgesReformation to today

Scroll through the centuries, or tap a dot. J K move between witnesses.

Apostolic Fathers

30–150
140c. AD
No remarriage

Shepherd of Hermas fl. c. 140 ADShepherd of Hermas Mandate 4.1.4–8

"Sir," I said, "if a man has a wife who believes in the Lord, and he finds her in adultery, does the husband sin if he lives with her?" "As long as he does not know," he said, "he does not sin. But if the husband knows her sin and the wife does not repent but continues in her fornication, and the husband lives with her, he becomes guilty of her sin." "What then shall the husband do, sir?" "Let him put her away, and let the husband remain by himself. But if, having put away his wife, he marries another, he too commits adultery." "And if, sir, after she is put away the wife repents and wants to return to her husband, shall she not be received?" "Indeed, if the husband does not receive her, he sins."

Separation for adultery is allowed, but not remarriage, so that the door to repentance stays open. Hermas says the same applies to a wife.

Full English of this work is being translated

Before Nicaea

150–325
155c. AD
No remarriage

Justin Martyr c. 100–c. 165 ADFirst Apology 15.5

Just as those who make second marriages by human law are sinners in the eyes of our Teacher, so are those who look at a woman to lust after her.

"Second marriages" here probably means remarriage after divorce, which Roman law allowed.

Full English of this work is being translated
177c. AD
No remarriage

Athenagoras fl. c. 177 ADPlea for the Christians 33.2–3

... either to remain as one was born, or in one marriage; for a second marriage is a decent adultery. "Whoever puts away his wife," he says, "and marries another, commits adultery": he does not allow a man to put away the woman whose virginity he ended, nor to marry again. For whoever deprives himself of his first wife, even if she has died, is an adulterer in disguise.

Athenagoras goes further than most: even remarriage after a spouse's death. The Church did not adopt this; it allowed widows and widowers to remarry.

Full English of this work is being translated
246c. AD
No remarriage

Origen of Alexandria c. 185–c. 254 ADCommentary on Matthew 14.23

But now too, contrary to what is written, some of the rulers of the church have permitted a woman to marry while her husband is living... 'A wife is bound for as long as her husband lives'... and a woman married to another man while her husband lives 'will be called an adulteress'.

Origen reports the concession; he does not praise it. He adds that it was 'not altogether without reason', granted 'in comparison with greater evils', against what was ordained from the beginning. That sentence is too broken in the PG 13 scan to quote word for word, so it is reported here rather than quoted. The Greek witness named for this gap in the store (Khazarzar PG 11-17) in fact contains only Books 10 and 11 of the commentary, so the words quoted are read from the PG 13 scan text (poor OCR, columns interleaved), saved as a witness in Wave 3.

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text

Nicaea to Chalcedon

325–451
374c. AD
No remarriage

Basil of Caesarea c. 330–379 ADLetter 188, to Amphilochius (First Canonical Letter) Canon 9

The Lord's ruling, followed through in its sense, fits men and women equally: no one may leave a marriage except for unchastity. But custom does not run that way. For women we find much strictness. ... Custom also orders wives to keep husbands who are adulterers and live in fornication. So a wife who leaves her husband and goes to another man is an adulteress; but the husband who was left is pardonable, and a woman who lives with such a man is not condemned.

Basil states the Lord's rule as equal for both sexes, then records that church custom (synetheia) held wives to a stricter account than husbands, and let a deserted husband's new union pass without condemnation. A canon of discipline describing practice, and an early root of the East's more lenient custom. Quoted from the PG 32 scan (poor OCR).

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text
420c. AD
No remarriage

Augustine of Hippo 354–430 ADOn Adulterous Marriages 1.2

Because of so great an evil, a man may not put away his wife except for the cause of fornication. For then he does not make her an adulteress by putting her away, but puts away an adulteress.

Augustine argues that even after such a separation neither may remarry while the other lives.

Full English of this work is being translated

Reformation

1500–1700
1563AD
No remarriage

Council of TrentSession 24, Canons on Marriage Canon 7

If anyone says that the Church errs when she has taught and teaches, according to the teaching of the Gospel and the apostles, that the bond of marriage cannot be dissolved because of the adultery of one of the spouses, and that neither, not even the innocent one who gave no cause for adultery, can contract another marriage while the other spouse lives ... let him be anathema.

Worded carefully so as not to condemn the Greek churches, which allowed remarriage after adultery.

Full English of this work is being translated · Source text
1646AD
Innocent may remarry

Westminster AssemblyWestminster Confession of Faith 24.5–6

In the case of adultery after marriage, it is lawful for the innocent party to sue out a divorce: and, after the divorce, to marry another, as if the offending party were dead. ... nothing but adultery, or such willful desertion as can no way be remedied by the church, or civil magistrate, is cause sufficient of dissolving the bond of marriage.

The Reformed view, close to the Orthodox practice of allowing remarriage in some cases.

Witnesses not in the library yet

These writers also matter for this question. Their texts will join the timeline above once they are translated.

  • 407
    Council of Carthage, Canon 102 (407)

    Neither divorced spouse may remarry; an imperial law should be sought. Still not quoted: no verifiable text on the mini.

How this page was made

Every early quote was read in its Greek or Latin and translated for this page by Claude (Opus 5.5) on 13 October 2026. Each line names the printed edition it was read from. A quote marked indirect does not state the answer outright; read its note. A writer's silence is never counted as an answer.