Two Dissertations · §392 · John Davenant

Cap. IV Arg. 8 Sol: king and beggar — robes precede crowning, not the first destination

An example: some conditions can be required beforehand so that Peter is saved or brought into the heavenly kingdom, without being required beforehand so that he is elected or destined by God to eternal life. Suppose a king sees a beggar in rags, foul with ulcers, yet from mere good pleasure decrees to adopt him and raise him to the kingdom's crown — and also orders that before crowning he be clothed in royal garments and purged of uncleanness, and not crowned until thus purged and clothed. Who does not see those fair garments and the purging were decreed and prerequired as antecedent to crowning, yet not as antecedent motives for the first destination of kingdom and crown?

Latin

Exemplo illustrabimus ea quae dicta sunt, et ostendemus quasdam conditiones requiri posse ut previas, quo Petrus servetur, vel in regnum caeleste introducatur, quae non requiruntur ut previae, quo eligatur, sive ad vitam aeternam a Deo destinetur. Ponamus Regem aliquem, conspecto mendico pannis obsito, ulceribus foetido, decernere nihilominus ex mero suo beneplacito hunc talem adoptare, et ad regni coronam evehere; insuper tamen ordinare ut antequam coronetur, regalibus vestimentis induatur, et ab immunditie sua purgetur, neque coronetur nisi prius ita fuerit purgatus et indutus. Quis non videt pulchra haec vestimenta et purgationem decreta et praerequisita fuisse tanquam praecedanea ad actum coronandi, et tamen non fuisse praerequisita tanquam praecedanea motiva ad primam destinationem regni et coronae?

Report a mistake in this passage