Theological Theses · §162 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

Summary: Church witness proves Scripture — it is not a higher rule of faith

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

In short, then: we grant that the sacred books' authority is rightly and validly proved by the Church's consensus and testimony.

We deny what the adversaries infer — that the Church's testimony is a rule of faith better known to us than Scripture itself.

Not every sound proof is taken from a rule and principle of faith, or even from what is simply better known and more certain. Often we must prove the point to the person before us, and a posteriori.

Latin

XLIV. In summa ergo fatemur authoritatem librorum sacrorum per Ecclesiae consensum & testimonium recte & valide probari. Sed negamus tamen inde sequi quod adversarii volunt, nempe Ecclesiae testimonium esse regulam fidei Scriptura ipsa notiorem quoad nos. Non enim omnis bona probatio ex aliqua fidei regula & principio sumitur, nec etiam ex eo quod est simpliciter notius & certius: sed saepe res probare cogimur ad hominem, & a posteriori.

Report a mistake in this passage