Rome: freedom does not require indifference to good and evil; God, Christ, the angels, the damned
It should also be noted that in the common view of the Roman Church's teachers freedom does not require indeterminacy or indifference between acting well and acting badly. The ability to act well is no part of the essence of freedom, and still less the ability to act badly.
They hold that God is the freest of agents, yet he cannot act badly. Neither could Christ as man at any time. Nor can the angels and heavenly spirits now, who by God's singular favour are unchangeably confirmed in good, and they are none the less free for that.
Conversely, by their own admission, the devils and the spirits of the damned in hell can do nothing good, and yet they act freely and free choice has remained in them.
The reason is that, though the first are fixed on acting well and the second on acting badly, both can refrain from particular acts and choose among several goods or several evils. See Puteanus on the Prima Secundae, q. 10, arts. 1-4, doubt 3, and William Estius on the second book of the Sentences, dist. 14, §5.
Latin
XLIV. Praeterea observandum est, ex communi Doctorum Ecclesiae Romanae sensu, ad libertatem non requiri indeterminationem & indifferentiam ad bene, vel male agendum. Nec esse de libertatis ratione posse bene operari, & multo minus adhuc posse male operari. Agnoscunt enim Deum esse agens liberrimum, qui tamen male agere non potest: ut nec potuit unquam Christus homo: neque jam possunt angeli, & spiritus coelestes qui, ex singulari Dei beneficio, sunt immutabiliter in bono confirmati, nec propterea tamen minus liberi sunt. Contra vero, iis fatentibus, Cacodaemones & Spiritus damnatorum in inferno nihil boni agere possunt, & tamen libere agunt, ac in iis mansit liberum arbitrium. Idque quoniam, licet illi ad bene agendum, & hi contra ad male agendum determinati sint, possunt tamen ab his & illis actibus abstinere, & inter plura bona, vel mala eligere. Ut videre est apud Puteanum in 1. 2. quaest. 10. art. 1, 2, 3, 4. dubit. 3. Et apud Gulielmum Estium in 2. sent. dist. 14. §. 5.