What the second party means when they say the man so moved cannot not act
Those on the other side, who teach that necessity of many kinds is compatible with freedom, and that a man moved by grace or driven by his own judgment's dictate to act cannot fail to act, mean only this. When God moves a man to some act, whether by the grace said to work in men both to will and to do, or at least by the efficacy of common providence, or even by the judgment of his own reason, the man cannot fail to produce the act he is assumed to have been moved and stirred to.
So once such grace and help, and such a judgment, are given, it follows necessarily that the man will act in this way or that.
Latin
XIX. Qui vero contra docent multiplicem necessitatem cum libertate consistere, & illum quem gratia movet aut judicii proprii dictamen ad agendum impellit, non posse non agere, non aliud sibi volunt quam impossibile esse ut homo qui movetur a Deo ad aliquem actum, gratia illa quae in hominibus operari dicitur velle & perficere, vel saltem providentiae communis efficacia, aut etiam rationis propriae judicio, non eliciat actum illum ad quem sic supponitur motus & excitatus: adeoque ex positione talis gratiae atque auxilii & talis quoque judicii, necessario sequi hominem sic, vel sic acturum.