Others know futures in the decree alone: Scotus and others, Calvin, and Twisse against Penot and Suárez
There are, however, other teachers in the Roman school who reject this presence of future things in eternity in their own existences as empty and invented. They hold that every future contingent, whether it comes from free second causes or from other natural causes, is known with certainty and without fail in God's decree alone, by which he decreed that it should happen. This view is usually attributed to many of the older scholastics, such as Scotus, Richard, Hervaeus, John Major and a good number of others.
Very many Reformed theologians also embrace it, teaching with Calvin that God foresees what will happen for no other reason than that he decreed it should happen. William Twisse, among the most celebrated English theologians, sets out, defends and illustrates this teaching of Calvin at length, through almost the whole of his dissertation on middle knowledge, written against Penot and Suárez.
Latin
XXXIII. At vero sunt alii in Schola Romana Doctores, qui praesentiam istam futurorum in aeternitate, secundum proprias suas existentias, rejicientes ut vanam atque commentitiam, affirmant omnia futura contingentia, tam quae ex causis secundis liberis, quam quae ex aliis causis naturalibus eveniunt, in solo divino decreto, quo illa fieri decrevit, certo & infallibiliter cognosci. Quae opinio multis veteribus Scholasticis tribui solet, Veluti Scoto, Ricardo, Herveo, & Joanni Majori, aliisque non paucis. Atque hanc quoque sententiam amplectuntur Theologi inter Reformatos plurimi, docentes cum Calvino, Deum non alia ratione praevidere quae futura sunt, quam quia ut fierent decrevit: Praesertim vero Gulielmus Tuissus inter Theologos Anglos celeberrimus, istam Calvini Doctrinam pluribus explicat, tuetur & illustrat, tota fere dissertatione de scientia Media, adversus Penotrum & Suaresium.