Theological Theses · §2274 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

Against a 'virtual and implicit' love of God in the ignorant

Thesis XIV. It is useless for some to distinguish here between a virtual, implicit love of God and a formal, explicit one, as though someone who does not formally love God, and is even ignorant of him, could still be reckoned to love him implicitly when he loves certain actions God has commanded, actions that must for that very reason be reckoned pleasing to God.

For whoever does not know God, or does not act from love of God, whether actual or habitual, undoubtedly acts from love of himself and loves himself above all things. He loves an upright action only so that he may take joy in it and be pleased with himself. Every love of self not subordinated to the love of God is vicious and sinful, and it is wholly unreasonable to find a praiseworthy implicit love of God inside a vicious love.

Latin

XIV. Caeterum frustra hic distinguunt nonnulli quendam amorem Dei virtualem atque implicitum, ab amore Dei formali atque explicito: quasi aliquis Deum formaliter non diligens, imo Deum ignorans, censeri tamen posset illum implicite amare, cum diligit actiones quasdam a Deo praeceptas, quae hoc ipso Deo placere censendae sunt. Nam qui Deum ignorat, aut non operatur ex Dei amore, vel actuali vel habituali, proculdubio ex sui amore operatur, ac seipsum supra omnia diligit; nec actionem honestam diligit, nisi ut ea gaudeat, atque sibi placeat. Omnis vero sui amor qui divino non subordinatur, vitiosus & peccaminosus est. In amore autem aliquo vitioso laudabilem quendam Dei amorem implicitum esse, prorsus est contra rationem.

Report a mistake in this passage