After Trent: is habitual grace of faith? Soto denies
Thesis XIX. Since the Council of Trent nobody follows Pighius, and his view is commonly condemned, at the least as very rash. Even so, the theologians of the Roman School still argue among themselves whether it is a matter of faith that habitual grace is given, and whether those councils meant to define the point as of faith.
After the Council of Trent, Domingo de Soto, a distinguished doctor who had been present at it, denied that they did. Others commonly hold it more probable that this teaching is of faith.
Latin
XIX. Et quanquam hodie nullus est post Concilium Tridentinum, qui Pighium sequatur; & sententia ejus communiter damnetur, saltem ut valde temeraria: nihilominus adhuc inter se disputant Scholae Romanae Theologi An de fide sit dari gratiam habitualem, & an Concilia praedicta intenderint rem illam, tanquam de fide definire. Quod post Concilium Tridentinum, negavit Dominicus Soto Doctor insignis, qui illi interfuit. Licet communiter alii sentiant probabilius esse quod dogma istud sit de fide.