Both sides grant both senses of grace; mutual accusations are groundless
Thesis XLII. From what we have set out so far about the various divisions and senses of grace in both the Roman and the Reformed school, it is plain that the theologians of the Roman Church freely teach and grant that in holy scripture grace is not always taken for gifts and helps of God that inhere in us, and that grace sometimes means God's favour itself, from which those gifts and helps come.
In turn, the Reformed doctors do not deny that scripture often gives the name of grace to the gifts and effects of God's favour.
So some of the Reformed are wrong to accuse the doctors of the Roman school of meaning nothing by grace but some supernatural gift infused into us. And the doctors of the Roman school have no reason to attack the Reformed and complain of them as if they acknowledged no grace inhering in us.
Latin
XLII. Caeterum ex iis quae a nobis fuerunt hactenus exposita circa varias gratiae divisiones & acceptiones, tam in Schola Romana, quam in Schola Reformata, manifestum est Theologos Ecclesiae Rom. ultro docere atque concedere gratiam in scriptura sacra non semper sumi pro quibusdam Dei donis & auxiliis nobis inhaerentibus, sed per gratiam quandoque intelligi ipsum Dei favorem, unde procedunt dona & auxilia illa. Et vicissim Doctores Reformatos non negare in scriptura gratiae nomen saepe tribui divini favoris donis atque effectis. Ideoque frustra Reformati nonnulli Scholae Romanae Doctores arguunt, quasi per gratiam nunquam aliud intelligi vellent quam donum aliquod supernaturale nobis infusum. Et contra absque ratione Scholae Romanae Doctores Reformatos exagitant, & de iis queruntur, quasi nullam agnoscerent gratiam nobis inhaerentem.