Alvarez: grace in the intellect alone is not simply sufficient
Thesis XXXIV. Be that as it may, that doctor holds that no grace is sufficient for any good work or devout action unless it not only enlightens the intellect inwardly but also in some way moves and affects the will.
'Rousing grace,' he says, 'by which only the intellect is enlightened or moved, is not the same as sufficient grace, speaking without qualification, but only in a certain respect. For not only the intellect but the will too needs divine motion and prevenient grace to be made able to perform works of piety, since sin has corrupted the will more than the intellect.'
Latin
XXXIV. Sed quicquid sit, Doctor ille vult nullam gratiam sufficientem esse ad ullum bonum opus, & piam operationem, nisi eam quae non tantum intellectum intus illustrat, sed voluntatem etiam quodammodo movet & afficit. Gratia excitans, inquit, qua illustratur, vel movetur solus intellectus, non est idem quod gratia sufficiens, simpliciter loquendo; sed solum secundum quid: quia non solum intellectus, sed etiam voluntas indiget motione divina, & praeveniente gratia, qua potens reddatur ad opera pietatis exercenda, eo quod voluntas magis corrupta est per peccatum quam intellectus.