Theological Theses · §248 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

Unlikely that any properly divine authentic writing truly perished

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

We also doubt the premise: it is not likely any properly divine, authentic writing has truly vanished.

Providence is injured if God had a book written only to let it vanish useless to the Church.

Among books providence did keep, some are tiny and of no obvious necessity — so why invent larger lost equals?

Rome, which credits the Church with ἀδιαπτωσία and exalts her, still shames her if she let many God-given norm-books perish through neglect.

Latin

IV. Attamen nobis non est probabile ullum scriptum proprie divinum & authenticum periisse. Nec enim id videtur statui posse absque magna providentiae divinae injuria. Ad quid enim Deus curasset librum aliquem divinum & authenticum scribi, ut tamen Ecclesiae nulli usui foret, sed statim Deus illum intercidere pateretur? Cumque inter eos Scripturae sacrae libros, quos divina providentia mirabiliter huc usque conservavit, reperiantur quidam exigui valde, & quorum non magna potest videri necessitas, quis in animum inducere poterit Deum fuisse passurum, ut perirent tot libri non minoris authoritatis, quique tales finguntur ut istos magnitudine, momento, numero & usu superarint? Adde quod Pontificii qui ἀδιαπτωσίαν Ecclesiae tribuunt, & supra modum illius authoritatem extollunt, non levem tamen hac in re illi contumeliam faciunt, & ignominiam inurunt. Quis enim posset tantam in Ecclesia culpam & negligentiam excusare, ut libros divinitus conscriptos, & ipsi datos, ut per eos instrueretur in doctrina salutis, illisque uteretur tanquam fidei norma, & regula veritatis, ut tales, inquam, libros, eosque multos, interire sivisset, nec ea, qua par erat cura, custodivisset?

Report a mistake in this passage