The difference: a battle of words about the name 'sufficient'
Thesis LXXII. The difference is this: the Thomists say that grace which good action does not in fact follow is nevertheless sufficient, and that through it a proximate and complete power of acting well is given. Jansenius and his followers deny this.
Here the dispute is plainly a mere battle of words, a question about a name. For Jansenius denies that such grace is sufficient, and that it gives the proximate power of acting well, for one reason only: it lacks an aid that is plainly necessary for good action, as the Thomists themselves concede.
Latin
LXXII. In eo vero discrimen est quod Thomistae gratiam, quam actu non sequitur bona operatio, nihilominus dicunt sufficientem esse, & per illam dari potentiam bene operandi proximam & completam. Quod negat Jansenius & qui eum sequuntur. Qua in re apparet meram esse logomachiam & quaestionem de nomine. Quandoquidem Jansenius non propter aliud negat gratiam ejusmodi sufficientem esse, & per eam dari potentiam proximam bene operandi, quam quia deest illi auxilium aliquod ad bonam actionem plane necessarium, quod Thomistae concedunt.