Why one is converted and another not
Thesis XXXIV. 'If it is asked why this person is converted and that one not, we answer: this one is converted because God converts him while he sets up no new obstinacy; that one is not converted because he sets up new obstinacy. You will ask why this one sets up new obstinacy and the other does not. We answer: this one sets it up because he wants to; that one does not, because grace moves him not to want to.
You will ask whether the one who sets up no new obstinacy, and so is converted, does not have greater grace than the one who sets it up, and so is not converted. We answer that their antecedent and prevenient grace can be equal, but the first has cooperating grace and the second does not.'
Latin
XXXIV. Si quaeratur, Quae causa sit cur hic convertatur, ille non? Respondemus, hic convertitur, quia Deus hunc non opponentem novam contumaciam convertit; ille non convertitur, quia novam contumaciam opponit. Quaeres, cur hic opponit novam contumaciam, alter non? Respondemus, hic opponit quia opponere vult; ille non opponit quia a gratia movetur ne opponere velit. Quaeres, Annon ille qui non opponit novam contumaciam, & per consequens convertitur, majorem habeat gratiam, quam qui opponit, & per consequens non convertitur: Respondemus antecedentem & praevenientem gratiam aequalem esse posse: sed cooperantem habet prior, non posterior.