Theological Theses · §308 · Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu

Absurd: Paul writes about head-coverings yet postpones the chief part of Christian worship

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Even without 1 Cor 1/15, the timeline is absurd.

Would Paul plant a church and omit the chief sacrificial sum of Christian religion?

Yet he writes now about men's and women's attire in the assembly.

And postpone sacrament institution — Rome's supposed chief part of worship — for later? Preposterous.

Latin

XIV. Sed, etiamsi Paulus diserte non significaret se jam Corinthiis omnia necessaria tradidisse, quis in animum posset inducere Paulum, quum Corinthiis Evangelium praedicaret, & Ecclesiam apud ipsos constitueret, nihil ipsis tradidisse de sacrificio illo in quo religionis Christianae summa constituenda est, & pars ejus longe praecipua? Et quam praepostera esset ista diligentia Corinthiis scribere de habitu quo viri & feminae debeant in publicis coetibus adesse, in aliud vero tempus differre institutionem de Sacramentis, & eo quod in cultu divino pars praecipua putatur?

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Louis Le Blanc, a Reformed professor at Sedan, sets out theology in theses argued against Rome: Scripture, faith, grace, free choice, good works and the saints.

This volume holds the Theses on Theology I–XLIII and On Faith I–XXII, in eighteen sections.

Louis Le Blanc de Beaulieu (1614–1675) was minister and professor of theology at the Academy of Sedan, the Reformed school on France's eastern border. His Theses were disputed by students over many years and collected in a London folio (1675).

The Theological Theses range across the whole Reformed system — Scripture, God, predestination, grace, and justifying faith — in the crisp thesis-and-proof form of the seventeenth-century schools.

Date1675 AD (Sedan theses; London collection)

No modern English.

Reference

ESTC R17887; Wing L802. IA bub_gb_eOkHAW4G0-wC (+ EEBO 1675 for gap leaves).

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Pitt 1675) (Latin)
Also checked PDF of the 1675 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext of De Theologia pages (Latin)
Also checked DjVu machine-read text of the 1675 (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake