Nothing better than trust in God
Do not suppose that, in a way unfitting for the Christian doctrine, I have brought in against Celsus those who have taught philosophy on the immortality or the survival of the soul. Since we share some things with them, we shall find it easier to show that the blessed life to come will belong only to those who have accepted the worship of God that Jesus teaches, and a devotion to the Creator of the universe that is sincere and pure and unmixed with anything at all that is created.
Let anyone who wishes show which better things we persuade people to despise. Let him set against one another, on the one side, the blessed end that we teach, an end with God in Christ, that is, in the Word and Wisdom (1 Corinthians 1:24, 30) and all virtue, which will come to those who have lived blamelessly and purely and have taken up an undivided and unbroken love for the God of the universe, and will meet them as the gift of God; and on the other side, the end set forth by each philosophical school among Greeks or barbarians, or promised by a mystery. Let him show that the end held by one of the others is better than ours, and that it holds together as true, while ours befits neither the gift of God nor those who have lived well; or that these things were not spoken by the divine Spirit who filled the souls of the pure prophets. Let anyone who wishes show that words admitted by all to be human are better than words shown to be divine and proclaimed by divine inspiration.
And what better things do we teach those who accept our word that they will do better to be rid of? If it is not too bold to say so, it is plain at once that nothing can be conceived as better than to entrust oneself to the God who is over all, and to give oneself to a teaching that draws a person away from everything created and brings him, through the Word, who is animate and living, who is also living Wisdom and the Son of God, to the God who is over all.
But since the third book of what we have dictated against the treatise of Celsus has now reached a sufficient length with these words, we shall bring our discourse to a close here, and in the books that follow we shall contend against what Celsus wrote next.
Greek
Μὴ ὑπολάβῃς δέ με οὐχ ἁρμοζόντως τῷ Χριστιανῶν λόγῳ παρειληφέναι πρὸς τὸν Κέλσον τοὺς περὶ τῆς ἀθανασίας ἢ τῆς ἐπιδιαμονῆς τῆς ψυχῆς φιλοσοφήσαντας· πρὸς οὓς κοινά τινα ἔχοντες εὐκαιρότερον παραστήσομεν ὅτι ἡ μέλλουσα μακαρία ζωὴ μόνοις ἔσται τοῖς (τὴν) κατὰ τὸν Ἰησοῦν θεοσέβειαν καὶ εἰς τὸν τῶν ὅλων δημιουργὸν εὐσέβειαν εἰλικρινῆ καὶ καθαρὰν καὶ ἄμικτον πρὸς ὅτι ποτ᾿ οὖν γενητὸν παραδεξαμένοις. ποίων δὲ κρειττόνων καταφρονεῖν παραπείθομεν τοὺς ἀνθρώπους, παραδεικνύτω ὁ βουλόμενος· καὶ ἀντιπαραθέτω τὸ καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς παρὰ θεῷ ἐν Χριστῷ, τουτέστι τῷ λόγῳ καὶ τῆ σοφίᾳ καὶ πάσῃ ἀρετῇ. τέλος μακάριον τοῖς ἀμέμπτως καὶ καθαρῶς βιώσασι καὶ τὴν πρὸς τὸν τῶν ὅλων θεὸν ἀγάπην ἀδιαίρετον καὶ ἄσχιστον ἀνειληφόσι συμβησόμενον, καὶ δωρεᾷ θεοῦ ἀπαντησόμενον. τῷ καθ᾿ ἑκάστην φιλόσοφον αἵρεσιν ἐν Ἕλλησιν ἢ βαρβάροις ἢ μυστηριώδη ἐπαγγελίαν τέλει· καὶ δεικνύτω τὸ κατά τινα τῶν ἄλλων τέλος κρεῖττον τοῦ καθ᾿ ἡμᾶς καὶ ἀκόλουθον μὲν ὡς ἀληθὲς ἐκεῖνο τὸ δ᾿ ἡμέτερον οὐχ ἁρμόζον δωρεᾷ θεοῦ οὐδὲ τοῖς εὖ βιώσασιν. ἢ οὐχ ὑπὸ θείου πνεύματος. πληρώσαντος τὰς τῶν καθαρῶν προφητῶν ψυχὰς. ταῦτα λελέχθαι. δεικνύτω δ᾿ ὁ βουλόμενος κρείττονας τοὺς ὁμολογουμένους παρὰ πᾶσιν ἀνθρωπίνους λόγους τῶν ἀποδεικνυμένων θείων καὶ ἐκ θεοφορίας ἀπηγγελμένων. τίνων δὲ καὶ κρειττόνων τοὺς ἀποδεχομένους διδάσκομεν ἄμεινον ἀπαλλάξειν; εἰ γὰρ μὴ φορτικὸν εἰπεῖν, αὐτόθεν φαίνεται ὅτι οὐδὲν οὐκ ἐπινοηθῆναι ὡς κρεῖττον εἶναι δύναται τοῦ ἐμπιστεῦσαι ἑαυτὸν τῷ ἐπὶ πᾶσι θεῷ καὶ ἀναθεῖναι διδασκαλίᾳ, παντὸς μὲν ἀφιστάσῃ γενητοῦ προσαγούσῃ δὲ δι᾿ ἐμψύχου καὶ ζῶντος λόγου, ὅς ἐστι καὶ σοφία ζῶσα καὶ υἱὸς θεοῦ, τῷ ἐπὶ πᾶσι θεῷ. ἀλλὰ γὰρ αὐτάρκη περιγραφὴν ἐν τούτοις καὶ τοῦ τρίτου τόμου τῶν πρὸς τὸ Κέλσου σύγγραμμα ἡμῖν ὑπαγορευθέντων εἰληφότος, αὐτοῦ που καταπαύσομεν τὸν λόγον, ἐν τοῖς ἑξῆς πρὸς τὰ μετὰ τοῦτο γεγραμμένα τῷ Κέλσῳ ἀγωνιούμενοι.