Against Celsus, Book VI · §24 · Origen of Alexandria

The diagram of an obscure sect

Next, after the account he drew from the Mithraic mysteries, Celsus proposes that anyone who wishes should examine a certain rite of the Christians side by side with the Persian rite described before, setting them against each other and laying bare the Christian rite as well, and so see the difference between them. Now where he knew the names of sects to give, he did not hesitate to set out those he thought he knew. But where he ought rather to have done so, if indeed he knew, and to have taught which sect uses the diagram he sketched, this he has not done. It seems to me that here too he has set out the contents of the diagram in part, from garbled reports of a very obscure sect, the Ophites, I think.

We ourselves, in our love of learning, have come upon this diagram. In it we found the inventions of men of the kind Paul named, who make their way “into houses” and take captive “weak women burdened with sins, led away by various desires, always learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth” (2 Timothy 3:6–7). But the diagram was so wholly unconvincing that neither the easily deceived “weak women” nor the most boorish people, ready to be led by anything at all that sounds plausible, would have assented to it. At any rate, although we have travelled through many places of the earth and sought out those who everywhere profess to know something, we have met no one who championed the teaching of the diagram.

Greek

Ἑξῆς δὲ τῷ ἀπὸ τῶν Μιθραϊκῶν ληφθέντι λόγῳ ἐπαγγέλλεται ὁ Κέλσος τελετήν τινα Χριστιανῶν τελετῇ προειρημένῃ Περσῶν τὸν βουλόμενον συνεξετάσαι, ταῦτα ἀλλήλοις παραβαλόντα καὶ γυμνώσαντα καὶ τὰ Χριστιανῶν, οὕτω θεάσασθαι τὴν διαφορὰν αὐτῶν. καὶ ὅπου μὲν ᾔδει ὀνόματα εἰπεῖν αἱρέσεων, οὐκ ὤκνησεν ἐκθέσθαι ἃς ἐδόκει εἰδέναι· ὅπου δὲ μᾶλλον ἐχρῆν, εἴπερ ἠπίστατο, τοῦτο ποιῆσαι καὶ διδάξαι, ποία αἵρεσις χρῆται τῷ διατυπωθέντι διαγράμματι, τοῦτ᾿ οὐ πεποίηκε. δοκεῖ δέ μοι καὶ ἐκ τούτων ἐκ παρακουσμάτων ἀσημοτάτης αἱρέσεως Ὀφιανῶν οἶμαι ἐκτεθεῖσθαι τὰ τοῦ διαγράμματος ἀπὸ μέρους. τούτῳ δ᾿ ἡμεῖς κατὰ τὸ φιλομαθὲς ἡμῶν περιτετεύχαμεν, ἐν ᾧ εὕρομεν πλάσματα ἀνθρώπων, ὡς ὁ Παῦλος ὠνόμασεν, ἐνδυνόντων „εἰς τὰς οἰκίας καὶ“ αἰχμαλωτιζόντων „γυναικάρια σεσωρευμένα ἁμαρτίαις, ἀγόμενα ἐπιθυμίαις ποικίλαις, πάντοτε μανθάνοντα καὶ μηδέποτε εἰς ἐπίγνωσιν ἀληθείας ἐλθεῖν δυνάμενα.“ οὕτω δὲ πᾶσαν ἀπιθανότητα εἶχε τὸ διάγραμμα, ὡς μηδὲ τὰ εὐεξαπάτητα „γυναικάρια“ μηδὲ τοὺς ἀγροικοτάτους καὶ ὑφ᾿ οὑτινοσοῦν πιθανοῦ ἑτοίμως ἔχοντας ἄγεσθαι συγκατατεθεῖσθαι τῷ διαγράμματι. οὐδενὶ γοῦν, καίτοι γε πολλοὺς ἐκπεριελθόντες τόπους τῆς γῆς καὶ τοὺς πανταχοῦ ἐπαγγελλομένους τι εἰδέναι ζητήσαντες, περιτετεύχαμεν πρεσβεύοντι τὰ τοῦ διαγράμματος.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Celsus claims that the best Christian teachings were taken from Plato and said better by the Greeks, and he charges Christians with the diagram of an obscure sect and with a crude reading of Genesis. Origen answers that the plain speech of Scripture serves everyone, that the prophets spoke before Plato, and that the God of the Christians is spirit, not body, and is made known through His Word.

Translated from the Greek of Koetschau, GCS 2–3 (1899), via the Perseus digital text, which serves as the base text. Each chapter was translated from the Greek and then checked clause by clause against it in an independent review. No earlier English translation was consulted.

Printed text used

Translated from Koetschau GCS 2 – 3 (1899) — Greek (Greek · Book VI, chapters 1 – 81)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Greek on any section to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake