The days of creation and the borrowed light
But it is not our purpose now to give the account of things known by the mind and things perceived by the senses, and of how the natures of the days are divided between both kinds, nor to examine the passages one by one. For we would need whole treatises to explain the creation of the world as Moses tells it. This we did, as far as we could, long before the present treatise against Celsus, when, with the grasp we had many years ago, such as it was then, we discussed the six days of creation in Moses.
One should know, however, that through Isaiah the word promises the righteous that they will be in a state of day, in which not the sun but “the Lord” himself will be to them “an everlasting light, and God” their “glory” (Isaiah 60:19).
It was, I think, because he had misheard some wicked sect, which wrongly explained “Let there be light” (Genesis 1:3) as spoken by the Creator in the form of a wish, that he said: “For the Creator certainly did not borrow light from above, like people who light their lamps from their neighbours.” And it was because he had misheard another, impious sect that he also said this: “If the one who made these things against the great God’s will was some accursed god opposed to him, why did he lend him the light?”
We are so far from having to defend ourselves against these charges that we want to accuse those people’s opinion of error more plainly still, and take our stand not, as Celsus does, against what we do not know of theirs, but against what we know accurately: partly from the people themselves, whom we have followed closely, and partly from careful reading of their writings.
Greek
Νῦν δὲ διηγήσασθαι τὸν περὶ νοητῶν καὶ αἰσθητῶν λόγον, καὶ τίνα τρόπον διανενέμηνται αἱ φύσεις τῶν ἡμερῶν εἰς ἀμφότερα τὰ εἴδη, οὐ πρόκειται οὐδὲ τὰ κατὰ τοὺς τόπους ἐξετάσαι· ὅλων γὰρ ἡμῖν συντάξεων χρεία εἰς τὴν διήγησιν τῆς κατὰ Μωϋσέα κοσμοποιΐας· ὅπερ κατὰ τὸ δυνατὸν ἡμῖν πρὸ πλείονος χρόνου τῆς ἐνεστηκυίας πρὸς τὸν Κέλσον συντάξεως πεποιήκαμεν, ἀπὸ τῆς πρὸ πλειόνων ἐτῶν ἕξεως, ἧς ἐχωροῦμεν τότε, διαλαβόντες περὶ τῶν κατὰ Μωϋσέα [τῶν] ἓξ τῆς κοσμοποιΐας ἡμερῶν. εἰδέναι μέντοι γε χρὴ ὅτι τοῖς δικαίοις διὰ τοῦ Ἡσαΐου ὁ λόγος ἐπαγγέλλεται ἐν καταστάσει ἔσεσθαι ἡμέρας, ἐν ᾗ μὴ ἥλιος ἀλλ᾿ αὐτὸς ὁ „κύριος φῶς“ ἔσται αὐτοῖς „αἰώνιον, καὶ ὁ θεὸς δόξα“ αὐτῶν. παρακούσας δ᾿ οἶμαι μοχθηρᾶς αἱρέσεώς τινος καὶ κακῶς διηγησαμένης τὸ „γενηθήτω φῶς“ ὡς εὐκτικῶς ὑπὸ τοῦ δημιουργοῦ εἰρημένον εἶπεν· οὐ γὰρ δὴ καθάπερ οἱ τοὺς λύχνους ἐκ γειτόνων ἐναυόμενοι φῶς ὁ δημιουργὸς ἄνωθεν ἐχρήσατο. καὶ ἄλλης δ᾿ ἀσεβοῦς αἱρέσεως παρακούσας εἶπε καὶ τό· εἰ μὲν ἐναντίος τις ἦν τῷ μεγάλῳ θεῷ θεὸς κατηραμένος ὁ ταῦτα ποιῶν παρὰ γνώμην τὴν ἐκείνου, τί αὐτῷ τὸ φῶς ἐκίχρα; πρὸς ἃ τοσοῦτον ἀποδέομεν ἀπολογεῖσθαι, ὥστε τρανότερον ἡμᾶς ἐθέλειν τῆς ἐκείνων δόξης ὡς ἐσφαλμένων κατηγορεῖν καὶ ἵστασθαι οὐ πρὸς ἃ μὴ οἴδαμεν αὐτῶν ὡς ὁ Κέλσος ἀλλὰ πρὸς ἃ ἀκριβῶς γινώσκομεν, πῇ μὲν ἀπ᾿ αὐτῶν, ἀκολουθήσαντες, πῇ δὲ τοῖς συγγράμμασιν αὐτῶν ἐπιμελῶς ἐντυχόντες.