Against Celsus, Book VI · §76 · Origen of Alexandria

The prophecy and the Transfiguration

Let us grant that he did not read that prophecy, or that, having read it, he was led astray by those who misinterpret it as not prophesied about Jesus Christ. What will he say about the Gospel too, in which Jesus went up “onto a high mountain” and “was transfigured before” the disciples (Matthew 17:1–2) and was seen in glory, when also “Moses and Elijah,” “appearing in glory, spoke of his departure, which he was about to accomplish in Jerusalem” (Luke 9:30–31)?

Or is it that, when a prophet says, “We saw him, and he had no form nor beauty” (Isaiah 53:2), and what follows, Celsus accepts that this prophecy refers to Jesus, blind as he is in accepting what is said, and not seeing that it is a strong proof that Jesus, who seems to be without form, is the Son of God, that even his appearance was prophesied many years before his birth; but when another prophet says that comeliness and beauty belong to him, he no longer wants the prophecy to refer to Christ?

Now if it were clearly possible to gather from the Gospels that “he had no form nor beauty, but his form was without honour, falling short compared with the sons of men” (Isaiah 53:2–3), someone might have said that Celsus said these things not on the basis of the prophetic writing but on the basis of the Gospel. But as it is, since neither the Gospels nor even the apostles show that “he had no form nor beauty,” it is clear that he is forced to accept what comes from the prophecy as true of Christ; and that no longer allows his charges against Jesus to go forward.

Greek

Ἔστω δὲ μὴ ἀνεγνωκέναι αὐτὸν τὴν προφητείαν ἢ ἀνεγνωκότα περιεσπᾶσθαι ὑπὸ τῶν παρερμηνευόντων αὐτὴν ὡς οὐ περὶ Ἰησοῦ Χριστοῦ προφητευομένην· τί φήσει καὶ περὶ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου. ἐν ᾧ ἀναβὰς „εἰς ὑψηλὸν ὄρος“ „μετεμορφώθη ἔμπροσθεν“ τῶν μαθητῶν καὶ ὤφθη ἐν δόξῃ, ὅτε καὶ „Μωϋσῆς καὶ Ἠλίας“ „ὀφθέντες ἐν δόξῃ ἔλεγον τὴν ἔξοδον αὐτοῦ, ἣν ἔμελλε πληροῦν ἐν Ἱερουσαλήμ;“ ἢ ἐὰν μὲν προφήτης λέγῃ· „εἴδομεν αὐτὸν, καὶ οὐκ εἶχεν εἶδος οὐδὲ κάλλος“ καὶ τὸ ἑξῆς, καὶ ὁ Κέλσος παραδέχεται τὴν προφητείαν ταύτην ἐπὶ τὸν Ἰησοῦν ἀναφέρεσθαι, τυφλώττων περὶ τὴν παραδοχὴν τοῦ λεγομένου καὶ οὐχ ὀρῶν ὅτι μεγάλη κατασκευή ἐστι τοῦ τὸν ἄμορφον εἶναι δοκοῦντα Ἰησοῦν υἱὸν εἶναι θεοῦ τὸ πρὸ πολλῶν ἐτῶν τῆς γενέσεως αὐτοῦ πεπροφητεῦσθαι καὶ περὶ τοῦ εἴδους αὐτοῦ· ἐὰν δὲ ἄλλος προφήτης ὡραιότητα καὶ κάλλος εἶναι λέγῃ περὶ αὐτὸν, οὐκέτι βούλεται τὴν προφητείαν εἰς (Ἰησοῦν) Χριστὸν ἀναφέρεσθαι; καὶ εἰ μὲν σαφῶς ἦν ἀπὸ τῶν εὐαγγελίων λαβεῖν ὅτι „οὐκ εἶχεν εἶδος οὐδὲ κάλλος, ἀλλὰ τὸ εἶδος αὐτοῦ ἄτιμον ἦν, ἐκλεῖπον παρὰ τοὺς υἱοὺς τῶν ἀνθρώπων,“ εἶπεν ἄν τις οὐ κατὰ (τὸ) προφητικὸν εἰρηκέναι ταῦτα τὸν Κέλσον ἀλλὰ κατὰ τὸ εὐαγγελικόν· νυνὶ δὲ οὔτε τῶν εὐαγγελίων ἀλλ᾿ οὐδὲ τῶν ἀποστόλων ἐμφαινόντων ὅτι „οὐκ εἶχεν εἶδος οὐδὲ κάλλος,“ σαφὲς ὅτι τὸ ἀπὸ τῆς προφητείας ἀναγκάζεται παραδέχεσθαι ὡς ἀληθευόμενον περὶ Χριστοῦ· ὅπερ οὐκέτι ἐπιτρέπει τὰς περὶ Ἰησοῦ κατηγορίας προβαίνειν.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Celsus claims that the best Christian teachings were taken from Plato and said better by the Greeks, and he charges Christians with the diagram of an obscure sect and with a crude reading of Genesis. Origen answers that the plain speech of Scripture serves everyone, that the prophets spoke before Plato, and that the God of the Christians is spirit, not body, and is made known through His Word.

Translated from the Greek of Koetschau, GCS 2–3 (1899), via the Perseus digital text, which serves as the base text. Each chapter was translated from the Greek and then checked clause by clause against it in an independent review. No earlier English translation was consulted.

Printed text used

Translated from Koetschau GCS 2 – 3 (1899) — Greek (Greek · Book VI, chapters 1 – 81)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Greek on any section to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake