Commentary on the Song of Songs, Prologus · §12

Proper vs abusive use of love’s name

If someone says that we are also said to “love” money or a prostitute by the same word, it must be known that in these cases charity is named not properly but abusively. Charity properly tends toward God and toward the neighbor; other things are said to be loved only by misuse of the word. So it makes no difference in the Scriptures whether amor or caritas or dilectio is said, so long as the same force of affection is meant; but where there is occasion of falling, Scripture usually avoids the name amor and uses caritas.

Latin

Si quis dicat quia et pecuniam et meretricem eodem vocabulo diligere appellamur, sciendum est in his non proprie sed abusive caritatem nominari. Principaliter caritas ad Deum tendit et ad proximum; cetera abusive dicuntur amari. Nihil ergo interest in Scripturis utrum amor an caritas an dilectio dicatur, dum eadem vis affectus designetur; ubi vero occasio lapsus est, Scriptura nomen amoris vitare solet et caritatis uti.

About this text

Origen’s Commentary on the Song of Songs, Prologus (Rufinus’s Latin). Complete on this page: §§1–20.

English follows Baehrens, Origenes Werke VIII (GCS 33, 1925), Rufinus’s Latin of the Commentary Prologus. Lawson ACW 26 was not used as wording. This page is Prologus §§1–20 (closeout).

Witnesses

  • Copy-text Baehrens, Origenes Werke VIII = GCS 33 (1925) (Latin · Commentary Prologus §§1–20)

English is newly prepared for study from the stated edition. Open Latin on each section (or the Latin source witness link) for the source text. This is not a complete critical edition.