Chapter 4: Could Adam will the sin without willing the loss of righteousness
Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.
Garissoles' first reason.Things are not one and the same if a man can at once will the one and refuse the other.So here: Adam, eating the forbidden fruit, meant to break God's command, yet did not mean to lose his righteousness and privileges.
Latin
GAR. Etenim 1. non unum idemque sunt, quorum unum idem homo eodem tempore velle potest, & alterum nolle. At ita habet in hac causa. Adamus enim de fructu interdicto comedens, volebat violare Dei praeceptum, sed nolebat justitiam suam & praerogativas amittere.