On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §254 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 4: aeterna most proper; includes corporal

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

er: before God's court no death is more truly called death than eternal death; if you split bodily death off from it, even that no longer deserves the name 'death,' by Christ's own teaching. The law threatens eternal death only as the loss of all this life's goods—and that is no loss when better goods take their place. Add that eternal death includes the bodily—the loss of this life—so the law could not threaten the one without also threatening the other.

Latin

PLAC. Ego vero respondebo, cum de foro Dei agitur nullam magis proprie mortem dici quam aeternam: a qua si corporalis sejungitur, ne mors quidem amplius vocari debet ipso Christo autore: Eam enim non comminatur lex, nisi quatenus est jactura omnium huius vitae bonorum. Jactura autem non est, cum in eorum locum succedunt meliora. Adde quod mors aeterna corporalem includit, id est, huius vitae privationem, ut illam: comminari lex non potuerit, quin istam simul comminaretur.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake