On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §359 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 6: Tertio

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

d, since in this cause Calvin and the Theologians oppose these two—to be done by the force of nature, and to be done from the reason of divine judgment—how does the learned man say that is done by God's just judgment which is done so naturally that it cannot be hindered except against the order of nature, and unless the laws of natural propagation are overturned, and unless the sequel and natural efficacy of actual sin is stopped and checked?

Latin

GAR. Tertio cum in hac causa Calvinus & Theologi haec duo opponunt, fieri ex vi naturae, & fieri ex ratione judicii divini; quomodo vir doctus illud fieri dicit justo Dei judicio, quod fit ita naturaliter, ut impediri non possit, nisi contra naturae ordinem, & nisi evertantur leges naturalis propagationis, & nisi sistatur, & sufflaminetur peccati actualis sequela & efficacia naturalis?

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake