On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §367 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 7: courtier similitude limps — condition vs goods

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

courtier similitude limps — condition vs goods those goods can be lost by war, or prodigality, or dice, or lawsuits rashly undertaken, or some other thing, while faith is kept—or, faith being violated, can be retained. Here, however, the goods are rectitude, justice, holiness; the condition is the conservation of these very goods. For what was required of Adam except that he persevere in rectitude, justice, holiness, faith, duty? Do not these very goods include faith? do they not contain obedience to God?

Latin

Haec similitudo misere claudicat. Primum conditio est fidelitas; bona tituli, dignitates, fundi. Itaque conditio, & bona sub illa conditione accepta sunt res admodum diversae, & natura sua separabiles. Possunt enim bona illa bello, vel profusione, vel alea, vel litibus temere susceptis, vel aliqua alia re amitti conservata fide, aut hac violata retineri. Hic vero bona sunt rectitudo, justitia, sanctitas, conditio horum ipsorum bonorum conservatio. Quid enim ab Adamo exigebatur nisi ut perseveraret in rectitudine, justitia, sanctitate, fide, officio? Annon haec ipsa bona fidem includunt? obedientiam Deo continent.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake