On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §489 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: your actual-to-penalties vs my hereditary vice

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Let us see therefore which sin he understands. You will have it to be Adam's actual sin imputed to all humans unto two penalties, the privation of original righteousness or original vice, and death. I say it is original vice or hereditary corruption inhering in individual humans, but not Adam's actual sin immediately imputed to individual humans. Your opinion the reasons you brought do not prove: for to them, as you see, I have replied.

Latin

Videamus ergo quodnam peccatum intelligat. Tu vis esse peccatum actuale Adami imputatum omnibus hominibus ad duas poenas, privationem justitiae originalis seu vitium originale, & mortem. Ego dico esse vitium originale seu corruptionem haereditariam in singulis hominibus inhaerentem, non autem peccatum actuale Adami singulis hominibus immediate imputatum. Tuam sententiam, quas attulisti, rationes non probant: iis enim, ut vides, respondi.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake