On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §509 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: drowning grasp; Greek 'enter judgment' is not begin-to-be

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

the manner of those who are drowning, the learned man seizes whatever meets him: but in vain. For grant that the phrase eis to dikasterion eiselthein among the Greeks signifies to begin a suit, does it follow that the same verb constructed with any other noun is used for 'to begin'? Will, for example, eiselthein eis ton oikon, or eis ten polin, be to begin a house or a city, or so to begin to be in a house or city, that you were not there before?

Latin

PLAC. More eorum qui submerguntur, obvium quodque arripit vir doctus: sed frustra. Significet enim phrasis εἰς τὸ δικαστήριον εἰσελθεῖν apud Graecos incipere litem, num sequitur, idem verbum cum quovis alio nomine constructum pro incipere usurpari? Num ex. g. εἰσελθεῖν εἰς τὸν οἶκον, vel εἰς τὴν πόλιν, erit incipere domum vel urbem, aut ita incipere esse in domo vel urbe, ut antea non fueris?

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake