Chapter 9: Isaiah 53:6 speaks of the penalty, not the sin
The place Isaiah 53. 6. is not to the point, both because it is not the same verb: for the Hebrew word is not 'he made to enter' or 'to go in,' but 'he made to meet,' or 'to fall upon';l upon';l upon'; and because iniquity in that place signifies not the sin itself, but the penalty of sin. For it met Christ, falls upon him, rushes upon him, and, if you will, entered into him—not sin, but only the penalty of sin. But here sin is distinguished from the penalty of sin: for there follows, and through sin death. And so it cannot be proved that it can be the same, for sin to enter into someone, and for sin to be imputed to someone. But if sin, insofar as it is distinguished from penalty, entered into Christ, what is there why Christ could not have been called a sinner? If this is absurd, that also must be confessed to be absurd.
Latin
Locus Esai. LIII. 6. ad rem non est, tum quia non est idem verbum: הִפְגִּיעַ enim non est fecit ingredi seu introire, sed fecit occurrere, vel incurrere; tum quia iniquitas eo loco non ipsum peccatum, sed poenam peccati significat. Occurrit enim Christo, incurrit, irruit in eum, &, si ita vis, intravit in eum non peccatum, sed sola peccati poena. Hic autem peccatum a peccati poena distinguitur: sequitur enim, & per peccatum mors. Itaque probari non potest idem esse posse, peccatum in aliquem ingredi, & peccatum alicui imputari. Quod si peccatum, quatenus a poena distinguitur, ingressum est in Christum, quid est cur Christus non potuerit dici peccator? Si hoc est absurdum, illud quoque absurdum esse confitendum est.