On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §533 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: all sinners because all die; not from latent corruption

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Add that the Apostle proves in this place that all humans are sinners, that sin is in the world, that is in humans, by this argument, that all die. Do you think he proves that sin is in humans, because there is sin in humans, namely hereditary corruption? Does he draw the argument from a latent moral corruption, which itself was to be proved, when it was at hand from the open and known death of all?

Latin

Adde quod Apostolus probat hoc loco omnes homines esse peccatores, peccatum in mundo, id est in hominibus, hoc argumento, quod omnes moriuntur. Putasne probare eum peccatum esse in hominibus, quia sit in hominibus peccatum, nimirum corruptio haereditaria? Num a latente corruptione morali, quae ipsa erat probanda, ducit argumentum, cum suppeteret a patente & nota omnium morte?

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake