On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §548 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: In Adam we were created and expelled, without imputation

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

We can be said to have been created in Adam, to have been created just and blessed, to have been cast out of paradise, and so on, and yet neither his creation, nor original righteousness, nor casting out of paradise is imputed to us. Therefore we could be said to have sinned in him, in the way we can be said to have been in him, because he communicated to us both his nature and his sin by natural propagation.

Latin

Dici possumus in Adamo creati fuisse, creati fuisse iusti & beati, eiecti fuisse e paradiso &c., nec tamen eius creatio, aut iustitia originalis, aut eiectio e paradiso nobis imputatur. Potuimus ergo dici in eo peccasse, quomodo dici possumus in eo fuisse, quia ille quam naturam tam peccatum suum nobiscum communicavit propagatione naturali.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake