On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §554 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: Martyr answers Pighius on being made sinners

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

this reply is Pighian, and was formerly objected to our men, let Martyr refute it while I am silent, Commentary on Romans 5. 9. and Common Places, Class 2. chapter 1. section 8. Finally, he says, we have from Paul, that by the disobedience of one man many were constituted sinners; which indicates that in those who are born of Adam there is a vice because of which they can be called sinners. But Pighius thinks he can elude this, because sinners are sometimes so called because of guilt although the act of sinning has passed and no longer exists.

Latin

PLAC. Cum haec responsio Pighiana sit, ac nostris olim obiecta, eam, me tacente, refellat Martyr, Comm. in Rom. 5. 9. & locor. Comm. Class. 2. cap. 1. §. 8. Postremo, inquit, habemus a Paulo, per inobedientiam unius hominis, multos constitutos esse peccatores; quod indicat, in illis qui nascuntur ex Adamo esse vitium, propter quod peccatores dici possint. Sed hoc Pighius putat se posse eludere, quod peccatores interdum dicantur propter reatum quamvis actio peccandi praeterierit, neque amplius extet.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake