On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §561 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: three replies same sound; conjunction as sinner is not as origin alone

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

three replies of the learned man seem to me to sound the same; I will therefore refute them all together. First the conjunction with the sinner must be distinguished: for one is conjunction with the sinner insofar as he is a sinner, another with the sinner insofar as he is the man from whom we draw our origin. He cannot be free from sin who is joined with the sinner insofar as he is a sinner: for he is a partaker of the same sin, whether by consent, or by propagation, or by imitation, and so on.

Latin

PLAC. Idem sonare mihi videntur tres istae Viri docti responsiones; simul igitur omnes refellam. Principio distinguenda est coniunctio cum peccatore: alia enim est coniunctio cum peccatore quatenus est peccator, alia cum peccatore quatenus est homo a quo ducimus originem. Vacare peccato non potest qui cum peccatore coniunctus est quatenus est peccator: particeps enim est eiusdem peccati, vel consensione, vel propagatione, vel imitatione &c.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake