On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §577 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: split double question: when Christ satisfied vs when imputed

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Besides, the proposition when we satisfy in Christ, since it is not proper, needs explanation, and must be returned to its proper meaning: otherwise the fallacy of many questions is committed: for ns: 1. When did Christ satisfy? 2. When is Christ's satisfaction imputed to us? To that I answer, when he suffered on the cross; to this, when we believe in him.

Latin

Praeterea propositio quando satisfacimus in Christo, cum propria non sit, eget expositione, & revocanda est ad propriam: alioqui committitur fallacia plurium interrogationum: continet enim has duas quaestiones: 1. Quando Christus satisfecit? 2. Quando nobis Christi satisfactio imputatur? Ad illam respondeo, quando passus est in cruce; Ad hanc, quando credimus in eum.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake