On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §602 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: 1 Cor. 15 in Adam all die: each his own death; rise in Christ really, not by imputed resurrection

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

You also object a like phrase in a like matter from the same Apostle: in Adam all die. But that overturns your view. For he does not mean that all die in Adam by that very singular death by which Adam died, as if it were imputed to all, but each by his own proper death. So we are made alive, or rise, in Christ—not by imputation of Christ's resurrection, but by a real resurrection which each receives in himself.

Latin

Objicis etiam similem phrasim in re simili eiusdem Apostoli: in Adam omnes moriuntur. Sed ea tuam sententiam evertit. Non vult enim omnes mori in Adamo illa ipsa singulari morte, qua mortuus est Adamus, quae scilicet omnibus imputetur, sed sua quisque propria morte. Sic vivificamur, seu resurgimus in Christo; non per imputationem resurrectionis Christi, sed reali, & quam quisque in se suscipit, resurrectione.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake