On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §611 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 9: Each has his own death and corruption, yet dies in Adam

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

s no less certain that each of us dies by his own proper death, and has an internal corruption proper to himself and personally distinct from the corruption which actual sin made in Adam. Yet we have both by the force of that conjunction which joins us to Adam as head of the race. Still those facts do not keep the Apostle's words from being said to pertain to imputation when he testifies that we die in Adam.

Latin

GAR. Nec minus certum est unumquemque nostrum mori morte sua propria, & habere corruptionem internam sibi propriam, & personaliter distinctam a corruptione quam peccatum actuale fecit in Adamo. Habere autem utrumque ex vi conjunctionis illius quae nobis cum Adamo tanquam capite generis intercedit. Illa tamen non impediunt, quominus ad imputationem ea verba Apostoli pertinere dicantur, cum testatur, nos in Adamo mori.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake