← §632 Read continuously §634 → On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §633 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)
Chapter 9: Zanchius denies actu-sin in Adam: we were not yet actu
Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.
That Zanchius—whom you praise for your view in chapter 7 of your treatise—denies, adding this reason: because we were not yet in act. For how could it be that, when we were not yet in act, we should sin by act?
Latin Id Zanchius, quem tu pro tua sententia laudas Cap. tui tractatus vii. negat, addita hac ratione, quia nondum eramus actu. Nam qui fieri potuit, ut, quum nondum essemus actu, peccaremus actu?
Report a mistake in this passage
About this text Placeus wrote in the mid-seventeenth century as Reformed theology professor at the Academy of Saumur. This is not a patristic work. The 1661 Saumur Latin is public domain.
Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.
Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.
On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.
Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14
Date c. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)
The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.
Printed text used
We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.
Report a mistake
← §632 Read continuously §634 →