On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §672 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 10: then only reatus? Show ἁμαρτία used for bare guilt in Scripture

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

Guilt? Therefore by the sin which lasted in the world until the law, bare guilt alone is to be understood.

Let there be given us, then, some place from the New Testament in which ἁμαρτία is used for bare guilt alone; or at least some place from the Old, where it is so used when God’s judgment is in view.

For why in this place should that word, so frequent, be taken in a sense altogether unused?

This first.

Latin

Reatus? Igitur per peccatum quod usque ad legem duravit in mundo, solus reatus intelligendus est. Detur igitur nobis locus aliquis e Novo Testamento in quo ἁμαρτία pro solo reatu usurpetur; aut detur saltem aliquis e Veteri, ubi sic usurpetur, cum de Dei iudicio agitur. Cur enim hoc loco vox illa, tam frequens, acciperetur sensu prorsus inusitato? Hoc primum.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake