On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin · §81 · Josué de la Place (Placeus)

Chapter 8: Garissoles argues from the reign of death in Romans 5:17

Click or tap any sentence to jump there. The side buttons skip a paragraph.

IV. Let us come, then, to verse 17. From it, says D. Garissoles, a similar argument arises. The one by whose offense and fall death has always reigned and will reign to the end of the age — that one's offense-penalty pervades all. For death is certainly set by the Apostle as the effect of that cause (Romans 5:17). But by one offense of Adam death has so far reigned over all, and will go on reigning to the end of the age. Therefore the penalty of that offense and fall of Adam pervades all.

Latin

IV. Veniamus igitur ad verf. 17. Ex eo simile, inquit D. G. argumentum emergit. Cuius delicto & lapsu mors semper regnavit & regnatura est in finem seculi, eius delicti poena pervadit in omnes. Mors enim certe ab Apostolo ponitur, tanquam causae illius effectum. At uno Adami delicto mors hactenus in omnes regnavit, & porro regnatura est usque ad finem seculi. Igitur delicti & lapsus illius Adae poena in omnes pervagatur.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Josué de la Place (Placeus) on the imputation of Adam's first sin: chapters 1 to 12 and 14, and the later disputation up to its chapter on Romans 5:14, from the Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Josué de la Place (c. 1596–1655), known in Latin as Placeus, was pastor at Nantes and from 1633 professor of theology at the Academy of Saumur, the school of Cameron and Amyraut.

On the Imputation of Adam's First Sin argues the distinctive Saumur thesis: Adam's sin reaches his posterity only mediately, through the inherited corruption — never by immediate reckoning of a sin they did not commit. Fellow Reformed theologians rejected the view, but the book remains its classic statement.

Part only: Chapters 1–12 and 14, and the disputation up to Romans 5:14

Datec. 1645–1655 AD (written after the 1645 Synod of Charenton, and read in draft by Drelincourt by 10 December 1653; printed posthumously at Saumur, 1661; Reformed / Amyraldian circle)

The English is made from the 1661 Saumur Latin of chapters 1 to 12 and 14 and part of the later disputation. No earlier English was copied.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin (Saumur 1661) (Latin)
Also checked Text extract of Caput Primum (Latin)
Also checked machine-read text of the 1661 volume (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake