§.XIV [1]: With Luther vs Carolstadt/Zwingli/Tigurines — force ubiquity; refuse milder Luther/Bucer/Tigurina
[1.] Those who side with Luther against Carolstadt (innovating much at Wittenberg under authority that was not wholly private), against Zwingli (writing a little too spitefully and boastfully on Article XVII of his Articles' Explanation — "I began preaching the Gospel in A.D. 1516, when Luther's name had not even been heard in our regions"), and against the Zurichers (who sent Luther a Bible translation prepared under Leo Juda's lead and printed by Forschover, after Luther wanted his own published version received everywhere). On each of these see Calixtus, Judgment on Theological Controversies, nos. 48, 53, 72.
When those opponents, aiming to restore the Eucharist from papal abuses and superstitions to its old brightness, seemed to deny Christ's body and blood present in it, these men — "with all their heat, pressing adversaries on every side" (Calixtus, Judgment on Theological Controversies, number 47) — decide the bodily presence in the Supper must be pressed so hard that they push, too roughly, the new and awkward ubiquity opinion cut out for Luther in the heat of battle.
Nor will they bear at all those who follow the milder Luther, made surer by Bucer's Declarations and the Zurich Confession: that only a local, natural presence was denied in the Holy Supper, while sacramental and spiritual presence were both granted. Such people they will not treat as innocent and pure, easily freed by Christ; and they want tolerance from them too, though they themselves cannot come down into that milder view.
See the History of the Augsburg Confession by Kirchner, Selnecker, and Chemnitz, cited by Calixtus at num. 62 (end), with nums. 63–65, 69, 71, 75.
Latin
[1.] QUI CUM LUTHERO, partim per Carolostadium, multa Wittenbergae, non tamen omnino privatâ, innovantem Auctoritate, partim per Zwinglium, in Articulorum suorum Explanatione Articuli XVII. paulò invidiosius (ut videri poterat) atque jactantius scribentem: Capi Ego Evangelium praedicare Anno Salutis XVI. supra M.D., scilicet tempore, cùm Lutheri nomen in nostris Regionibus ne auditum quidem erat; partim denique per Tigurinos, Bibliorum Sacrorum translationem, à se, Leone Juda Antesignano, adornatam, per Forschoverum Typographum, Luthero transmittentes, postquam hic suam cumprimis Bibliorum Versionem in publicum editam, ubique recipi cuperet; (de quibus singulis Calixtus in Judicio de Controv. Theolog. nó. 48. 53. 72.) irritato, & cum isti Sacramentum Eucharistiae, multis ac tetris abusibus, & superstitionibus hactenus apud Pontificios deformatum, restituere pristino nitori intenti, praesentiam Corporis & Sangvinis Christi negasse in eo viderentur, totô fervente & undiquaque adversarios premere annisô (sunt verba Calixti num. 47.) praesentiam Corporis Christi ita in Coena urgendam arbitrantur, ut novam & incommodam de Ubiquitate Sententiam, in aestu certaminum Luthero excisam, importunius urgeant; Nec verò cum Luthero mitiori & ex Buceri Declarationibus ac Confessione Tigurina facto certiori, praesentiam Corporis Christi in S. Coena nullam, quam localem naturalemque negatam esse, Sacramentali pariter ac Spirituali admissâ, ita sentientes, omnino ferendos esse arbitrantur, tanquam innocentes & puros, à Christo facilè liberandos, seque ab his quoque tolerari optant, in suam licèt Sententiam descendere nesciis. Vid. Hist. August. Conf. à Kirchn. Selneccer. & Chemnitio confectam & Calixto allegatam l. c. num. 62. in fine, collat. cum num. 63. 64. 65. 69. 71. 75.