Annotatio V §.II close: Tridentine anathema if one affirms bread and wine remain (1 Cor. 11) — stop before Eph. 4 proof
Thus someone who affirms with Paul that in the Eucharist the substance of bread and wine remains (1 Cor. 11:26–28) is treated no milder than if he had trampled the whole foundation of the Christian faith:
Trent, Session XIII, Canon II, launches a terrible anathema in these words — if anyone says the substance of bread and wine remains with Christ’s Body and Blood, and denies that marvelous conversion of the whole substance of bread into the Body and of wine into the Blood (species alone remaining), which the Catholic Church most aptly calls Transubstantiation, let him be anathema (pag. M. 130).
Stop before the proof that true divine Fundamentals make the limits — from Ephesians 4 (authoritative and ratiocinative).
Latin
eóque porrò illi, qui e. g. affirmat cum Paulo, in Eucharistiae Sacramento remanere substantiam Panis & Vini, 1. Cor. XI. 26. 27. 28. haut aliter, ac si fundamentum fidei Christianae integrum conculcâsset, anathema terribile per Concilium Tridentinum Session. XIII. Canon. II. annunciatum sit his verbis: Si quis dixerit, in Sacrosancto Eucharistiae Sacramento remanere Substantiam panis & vini unà cum Corpore & Sanguine Domini nostri Jesu Christi, negaveritque mirabilem illam & singularem Conversionem totius Substantiae panis in Corpus & totius substantiae vini in Sanguinem manentibus duntaxat Speciebus panis & vini: quam quidem Conversionem Catholica Ecclesia aptissimè Transsubstantiationem appellat, anathema sit. pag. m. 130.