Coena Domini: How Lutherans themselves retreat from the letter
Yet the Lutherans deny (1) that the Bread is itself Christ's Body. Which is what the literal sense sounds. (2) likewise that This refers to the Bread, to what Christ was showing. Which is what the letter wants. (3) for them the word is becomes is in, is under, is contained, and so on. Against the letter. (4) they take Body as invisible and illocal. Again against the letter's will. (5) they shift the subject into the place of the predicate, for example My Body is in or under this bread, and so on. (6) they confess the way of speaking is synecdochic, by synecdoche of the contained or of the whole, and so on. Yet a figure which (they say) loses the name of figure; others call it an unusual locution, and so on. (7) they have parted far from one another in rendering these words: some take this of the bread; others complexly of bread and Body; others adverbially, Behold my Body; others actively, this whole action, and so on.
Latin
Licet Lutherani negent 1. Panem esse ipsum Corpus Christi, quod sonat sensus literalis. 2. Itidem negent Hoc referri ad Panem, ad id quod Christus monstrabat, quod vult litera. 3. To Est, sit illis inest, subest, continetur, &c. contra literam. 4. Corpus intelligant invisibile, illocale, invita rursum litera. 5. Mutent subjectum in locum praedicati, v. gr. Corpus meum est in vel sub hoc pane, &c. 6. Fateantur locutionem esse Synecdochicam, per Synecdochen contenti, vel totius, &c. sed quae amittat (ajunt) nomen figurae; alii inusitatam locutionem esse, &c. 7. Plurimum a se invicem discesserint in reddendis his verbis; dum alii hoc de pane; alii complexe de pane & Corpore; alii adverbialiter, Ecce Corpus meum; alii active, haec tota actio, &c.