A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §376 · Samuel Strimesius

Annotatio II §.IV: Chrysostom & Theodoret — bread remains after sanctification (Burnet / Picherellus)

Burnet (39 Articles p. 330) and Picherellus (Opusc. Theol. P. 176) stack the same loci.

Chrysostom to Caesarius: after sanctification the bread is worthy of the Lord’s-body name, yet the bread-signature remains.

Theodoret’s Dialogue II: the mystical signs keep prior substance, figure, and form — still bread to sight and touch, understood as believed.

Latin

Loca hujusmodi aliquot, eademque omnino, in medium adducunt Reverendissimus Burnetus in Expositione 39. articulorum Ecclesiæ Anglicanæ pag. 330. & doctissimus Picherellus Opuscula Theol. p. 176, Chrysostomi scil. ad Cæsareum Monachum scribentis: Sicut antequam sanctificatur panis, panem nominamus: Divina autem illum sanctificante gratiâ, mediante sacerdote, liberatus est quidem ab appellatione panis, dignus autem habitus est Dominici corporis appellatione, & signatura panis in ipso permanfit. THEODORETI in Dialogo ita loquentis: Neque signa mystica post sanctificationem recedunt à sua natura: Manent enim in priore substantia & figura & forma & videri & tangi possunt, suntque panis &c. intelliguntur autem ea quæ sunt & creduntur, Dialogo secundo.

Report a mistake in this passage

About this text

Samuel Strimesius, a candid inquiry into the controversies among evangelicals: the preface and selected controversies and notes, from the 1708 Latin. The rest is not yet translated.

Samuel Strimesius (1648–1730), born at Königsberg, taught philosophy and then theology at Frankfurt an der Oder and pastored its Reformed congregation; Oxford made him doctor of divinity in 1709.

The Candid Examination of the Gospel Controversies (Frankfurt, 1708) defends the Reformed claim to stand within the Augsburg Confession's legacy, then works through the Lord's Supper disputes with the Lutherans controversy by controversy.

This volume holds the opening stretch: preface, preliminary defenses, Part I, and the post-Luther controversies.

Part only: The preface and selected controversies

Date1708 AD (Frankfurt an der Oder; Reformed Viadrina faculty)

English follows the 1708 Francofurti ad Viadrum Latin of Prefatio §I–II, Crimina defenses through III, Part I Protheoria through Controversiae Obices/Historia/Varii gradus, Formula Discord/Disparitas, Ulterius confirmatur / Classes / Formula protest / triplex differentia, Coena Domini Controversiae Priores through Precariae Hypotheses (Controv. print pp. 34–40), Controversiae Post Lutherum Natae Controv. No modern English was copied. Sister Halle digitization of Ingenua in Arminianismum (DOI 10.25673/65287) remains Anubis-blocked — skipped; Controversias only.

Printed text used

Translated from Latin, Prefatio section I (Schrey & Hartmann 1708) (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Prefatio Crimina defenses pages 44-56 (Latin)
Translated from Latin, Crimina II rem + Crimina III + Cassel Art. (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Prefatio Crimina II – III pages 57-75 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Prefatio Crimina II – III pages 56-75 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Part I Protheoria body pages 114-120 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Part I Protheoria body pages 102-120 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 121-127 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Part I Protheoria pages 126-135 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Coena Domini pages 134-141 (Latin)
Translated from Latin, Post Lutherum Providentia Controv. (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Post Lutherum pages 141-155 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Post Lutherum pages 141-144 (Latin)
Translated from Latin, Controversiae Post Lutherum Controv. (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Hexades Prooemium PDF pages 179-186 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Hexades Prooemium pages 182-186 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 186-198 (Latin)
Also checked Tesseract Hexades Annotatio I pages 186-193 (Latin)
Also checked pdftotext Hexades Annotatio I PDF pages 192-205 (Latin)

We have not yet re-checked this work against its source. We made this study translation with AI help. No scholar has yet certified it as faithful and complete. Open Latin on any section, or the Latin source link, to see the source text. It is not a critical edition.

Report a mistake