Annotatio II §.IV close: CONCEPTIO error 3 — Bertram/Ratramnus & Berengar; embryo into public light; stop before §.V
THIRD error (9th–11th c.): crudely heard Bertram/Ratramnus on the figure of Christ’s body (to Charles the Bald), plus Berengar’s figure-sayings taken too raw.
Opponents denied figure so hard they urged corporal union — and so forced the long-fostered Consubstantiation embryo, crass or subtle, into public light.
Stop before §.V.
Latin
Accessit tandem TERTIUS error, Seculo nono & undecimo subnatus, ex partim crudè intellectis Bertrami, alias Ratramni, in libro de corpore Christi ad Carol. Calvum, de figura corporis Christi in S. Coena, ad mentem antiquiorum Patrum, enunciatis, alibi recitandis integris; partim crudè nimis, de eadem figura corporis Christi, Berengarii effatis, utut non ita crudè ab ipso acceptis, debitus: His enim sese opponentium plurimi, ita panem corporis Christi figuram negarunt in Eucharistia sacra esse, ut Corporalem hujus cum isto Unionem urserint, sicque conceptum fotumque hactenus Consubstantiationis embryonem, vel crassiorem, vel subtiliorem, in lucem publicam prodire fecerint.