Annotatio II §.V: Bertram knows only two opinions — spiritual vs corporal-by-conversion; no silent third
Bertram nearly settles it: in his day he knows only two opinions — spiritual presence (his own, with the Fathers of every age) versus corporal presence by conversion of the bread (Paschasius), which he attacks.
Had there been a novel third (consubstantiation), he would not have passed it in silence — least of all in his adversary.
Latin
Et tantùm non extra dubium idem ponente Bertramô, quando duarum duntaxat, tempore suo, de praesentia corporis Christi in sacra Coena, sententiarum meminit, initio libri sui pag. m. 3. 55. quarum alteram, de Spirituali praesentia, ipsemet, cum Patribus omnium seculorum, fovet, alteram, de Corporali, per Conversionem panis, adductam, in Paschasio Rhadeberto, oppugnat; Tertiam, si quae fuisset novitiamque, silentio haud praetervecturus, praesertim apud adversarium reperiundam.