A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §400 · Samuel Strimesius

Annotatio II §.VIII: Scotus and Durandus (1320) tolerate revival; Aquinas not to be dragged in

Some Scholastics did not reject the revival — Scotus early in the 14th century, and Durandus in 1320 (Otrokocsi, Irenicum VI.27ff.).

Aquinas is not to be dragged into this consent by Dorsche, even if he grants Transubstantiation is not proved from the Institution words alone.

Latin

Non-improbata Scholasticis nonnullis, sigillatim Scoto, subtili doctori, initio seculi XIV, famosissimoque Durando, Anno 1320, quorum testimonia lege apud Franciscum Foris Otrokocsi in Irenico Cap. 6. §. 27. & seq. non item Thomæ Aquinati, à Dorschæo, hoc locô, neutiquam in Consensum trahi merito, quanquam fassus introducatur Transsubstantiationem ex verbis Institutionis probari haud posse.

Report a mistake in this passage