A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §429 · Samuel Strimesius

Annotatio III §.V: Paschasius (IX) vs Bertram — conversion asserts; Otrokocsi on crassior substantial sense

Ninth century: Paschasius Radbertus rises against Bertram (who with the Ancients kept the bread a Figure) and expressly professes conversion — under visible bread-species only Christ’s flesh is offered; bread into flesh, wine into blood (De corp. & sang. Dom. 10 & 20).

Otrokocsi: Paschasius means a crasser substantial conversion, unlike ancients/Bertram’s sacramental-mystic speech.

Latin

Usque dum Seculo demum IX. exurgeret præced. annot. memoratus Paschasius Rhadebertus, Bertramum, panem Eucharisticum cum Veteribus, etiam Figuram corporis Christi contendentem, oppugnaturus, assertis autem hujusmodi, decertans, quæ Conversionem panis in corpus Christi, disertè profitebantur: e.g. cùm diceret: Sub specie panis visibilis, nihil aliud quam caro Christi porrigitur. Item: Panis in carnem, & vinum in sanguinem convertitur. lib. de corpore & sang. domini, cap. 10. & 20., allegante Francisco Foris Otrokocsi in Irenico cap. 6. §. 1. p. m. 69. ac sequenti modô in posteriorem Paschasii propositionem commentante: Scil. de crassiusculâ & substantiali conversione, ex mente Paschasii, secus quam aliqui veterum atque etiam ipse Bertramus, de sacramenti & mystica locutione & immutatione, locuti sunt nonnulli.

Report a mistake in this passage