A Candid Inquiry into the Controversies among Evangelicals · §598 · Samuel Strimesius

Annotatio IV §.XX: Taborite ‘with/in bread’ formulas seem Lutheran In/Cum/Sub — but Hoc is bread only

A Taborite article neither Danhauer nor Strauch noted could seem to serve junior-Waldenses–Lutheran consensus: ‘with the bread truly Christ’s body’ and ‘Christ’s body in the bread’ — formulas matching Lutheran In, Cum, and Sub.

But (1) in the same article the Taborites make Hoc in ‘This is my Body’ point to nothing but the bread — wholly alien to the modern Lutheran mind.

Latin

Equidem pro Consensu Waldensium Juniorum cum Lutheranis in puncto de S. Cœna, introduci posset, Articulus primus Taboritarum contra Papistas Pragenses de præsentia & adoratione Christi in Sacramento, à neutro licet Theologorum binorum, in Dissertationibus eorum notatus, quô expressè perhibent: Cum pane verè esse corpus Christi de Virgine sumtum pro nobis traditum. Item: Corpus Christi in pane esse: Quæ duæ formulæ dicendi exactè respondent tô In, Cum, & Sub Lutherano. At (1) In eodem articulo contendunt Taboritæ, pronomen, Hoc, in propositione Christi: hoc est Corpus meum, aliud nihil, quàm panem demonstrare, id quod à mente Lutheranorum modernorum omnino alienum est.

Report a mistake in this passage